State Courts Strike Liability Limits

By William Glaberson N. Y. Times News Service | THE JOURNAL RECORD, July 22, 1999 | Go to article overview

State Courts Strike Liability Limits


William Glaberson N. Y. Times News Service, THE JOURNAL RECORD


More than a decade after states began enacting laws to cut back big jury awards and curtail injury lawsuits, state courts across the country are overturning one measure after another, concluding that Americans have a powerful right to settle their disputes in court.

Top courts in states like Illinois, New Hampshire, Kentucky and, this month, Indiana and Oregon, have relied on provisions of state constitutions like guarantees of fair access to the courts to strike down all or part of the new laws that were passed under the banner of "tort reform." The new liability laws make it more difficult to bring some suits and seek to limit how much people can collect in accident, malpractice and other injury cases.

The highest courts of at least seven states have struck down all or part of new liability laws in the last three years. Dozens of new challenges to such laws are working their way toward state supreme courts across the country, including in Wisconsin, Alaska and Colorado, and a major decision is expected soon from the Supreme Court in Ohio, which enacted a sweeping new liability law two years ago. The cases focus on such state constitutional guarantees of "open courts" or the right to a jury trial.

In this rancorous second phase of the battle over the liability system, at least 87 decisions by state courts at all levels have found flaws with laws that have been enacted since the mid-1980s.

"The state courts are invalidating huge parts of the tort reform legislation to the consternation of supporters of tort reform," said professor Mark Geistfeld of New York University Law School. "There is much more judicial hostility to this kind of legislation than anyone was expecting."

The laws have also been upheld by lower courts across the country, with judges taking sides in one of the country's fiercest but least noted legal wars. In a January decision, the Virginia Supreme Court, one of the few top state courts to affirm the new laws recently, said a law limiting damages in malpractice cases passed muster under that state's constitution. But legal experts on both sides of the issue say the momentum is clearly on the side of the critics of the new laws.

In its July 15 decision striking down a law limiting to $500,000 the amount of damages injured people can recover for pain and suffering, the Oregon Supreme Court said that state's constitution "prohibits the Legislature from interfering with the full effect of a jury's assessment. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

State Courts Strike Liability Limits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.