Recent Trends in International Chapter 11 Cases: Pragmatic Reorganizations

By Hoogland, Mark | Texas International Law Journal, Winter 2006 | Go to article overview

Recent Trends in International Chapter 11 Cases: Pragmatic Reorganizations


Hoogland, Mark, Texas International Law Journal


ABSTRACT

Mark Hoogland's note examines the recent Avianca and Yukos bankruptcy cases. Both cases involved international companies with extensive non-U.S. commercial operations that nevertheless sought bankruptcy protection exclusively within the United States. Together, Avianca and Yukos offer a glimpse into the evolution of international bankruptcy law, as practiced by U.S. courts. International companies have motivations for filing in the United States, and prudence may be the only constraint on the international jurisdiction of U.S. bankruptcy judges. The recent addition of Chapter 15 to Title 11 may alleviate some of the problems considered, but the jurisprudential questions linger.

I. INTRODUCTION

[T]here is a profound and intimate correlation between insolvency-whether individual or corporate-and the very wellsprings of policy and social order from which national law ultimately draws its inspiration. For this reason, despite numerous general resemblances, national insolvency laws and procedures differ from one another almost infinitely in ways both great and small.1

Some bankruptcies are simple. U.S. courts efficiently dispatch the vast majority of consumer bankruptcies, which seldom raise difficult questions. Business bankruptcies, though they offer complexities galore and are much more likely to incur ruinous delays, are also generally handled adroitly. Sometimes, however, a company's assets, agents, headquarters, creditors, and customers are spread across multiple countries. In these international bankruptcies-sometimes called cross-border insolvencies or transnational bankruptcies2-the courts of multiple countries must decide hideously complicated questions of law and forum. Since the bankruptcy laws of different countries differ in myriad ways, U.S. and foreign courts regularly find themselves in an international conundrum. Sometimes courts agree to defer decision-making to a single court;3 sometimes courts "cooperate" while maintaining separate proceedings;4 other times courts bicker and threaten sanctions.5 Potential solutions abound, but no method for predictably deciding international cases has been consistently applied.

Courts must address two key issues in every international bankruptcy case: (1) choice of forum and (2) choice of law.6 These issues are encountered and decided in a variety of ways and distinguishing between them can be tricky.7 In an ideal world, once the proper forum is determined, that forum would apply local law. In practice, however, international bankruptcy cases proceed along a variety of paths. For example, a U.S. court might choose to administer a primary proceeding8 in the United States while a parallel primary proceeding takes place in a different country. Alternatively, a U.S. court might be asked-or decide, sua sponte-to cede control of U.S. assets to a foreign primary proceeding (by way of an ancillary U.S. proceeding). Lastly, a U.S. court might decide that the United States is the ideal forum and request cooperation from foreign courts.9

Two theoretical camps offer different answers to the choice of forum and choice of law questions. Historically, most countries have developed a territorial "grab rule,"10 where each country claims plenary power over whatever assets are located within its borders." Territorial bankruptcy schemes favor local creditors, who are most familiar with local laws and well positioned to take advantage of them.12 The major advantage of territorialism is the relative ease with which forum and law can be decided: for a U.S. asset, territorialism would demand that a U.S. forum apply U.S. law. For a Colombian asset, Colombian law would govern a Colombian proceeding. Complications-such as airplanes leased in one country and operating across five other countries-invariably make determinations of forum and law more difficult. Still, territorialism proves a tempting option due to its procedural simplicity.

Unfortunately, strict territorial schemes disregard any pretense of equitable crossborder asset distribution, divvying the scraps between local favorites instead. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Recent Trends in International Chapter 11 Cases: Pragmatic Reorganizations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.