Testimony from the Old Dominion before the Joint Committee of Reconstruction

By Lowe, Richard | The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Summer 1996 | Go to article overview

Testimony from the Old Dominion before the Joint Committee of Reconstruction


Lowe, Richard, The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography


by RICHARD LOWE*

HISTORIANS have generally agreed that the Joint Committee of Fifteen on Reconstruction played a significant role in the reintegration of the Union after the Civil War.l Nevertheless, they have devoted surprisingly little attention to the testimony taken by the committee during the winter and spring of 1866. Considerable interest has been focused on the committee's drafting of the Fourteenth Amendment and of various other pieces of legislation, but there has been little examination of the testimony or the witnesses and interrogators who compiled the information collected by the committee. In Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction (1960), Eric L. McKitrick recognized this problem and called for a more detailed examination of the committee's hearings. Few scholars, however, have heeded his suggestion.2

Analysis of the testimony given on the Commonwealth of Virginia is a crucial first step toward gaining a better understanding of the information compiled by the joint committee. Of the 137 witnesses on eleven states who appeared personally before the committee, forty-nine (36 percent) were from Virginia. Half of all the southern Unionists (seventeen of thirty-four), more than half of all former Confederates (nine of seventeen), and 100 percent of the black men (seven) who gave statements to the joint committee testified about conditions in the Old Dominion. More pages of oral testimony were collected on Virginia than on any other state. Indeed, the figure for Virginia was more than four times greater than the mean number of pages of testimony for the other ten states of the former Confederacy.3

Why the Old Dominion was given such prominence before the joint committee is not explicitly spelled out in the panel's report. The physical proximity of Virginians to the hearing room in Washington and Virginia's leading role in the Confederacy doubtless provide much of the explanation. In any case, an analysis of the testimony on Virginia should provide a revealing look at the information solicited and offered before the joint committee.

One month after the formation of the committee in December 1865, members agreed to form four subcommittees of three persons each to take testimony. The subcommittee appointed by Chairman William P. Fessenden, Republican senator from Maine, to hear witnesses on the states of Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina was composed of Senator Jacob M. Howard (Michigan), Congressman Roscoe Conkling (New York), and Congressman Henry T. Blow (Missouri), all Republicans.4

By far the most active member of the subcommittee was Howard of Michigan. This New England-born former Whig was one of the founders of the Republican party in 1854 and was consistently radical in word and deed during Reconstruction. He was a large, red-cheeked man with a prominent nose, gray hair, and an educated, if ponderous, manner of speech. He alone interviewed forty-eight of the forty-nine witnesses from Virginia, and he shared questioning with Conkling and Blow of the forty-ninth (Robert E. Lee). Unlike some members of the joint committee, Howard rarely missed a meeting; his one brief absence was to attend the funeral of his wife of thirty years. Indeed, of the twelve men who served on the four subcommittees, Howard was easily the most prominent interrogator. He interviewed five witnesses before other subcommittees as well as all of the Virginia witnesses. Fessenden may have been chairman of the overall panel, but Howard was the man who elicited most of the information about the states of the Confederacy. The Michigan senator's leading role in the testimony phase of the committee's work, overlooked by historians, supports the view that Howard was a more significant figure in Reconstruction politics than is generally understood.5

The ambitious and flamboyant Conkling, thirty-six years old, first entered the House of Representatives in 1859, clung closely to the radical wing of the Republican party during and after the war, and became increasingly prominent in the postwar years. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Testimony from the Old Dominion before the Joint Committee of Reconstruction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.