Is Deconstruction a Jewish Science? Reflections on "Jewish Philosophy" in Light of Jacques Derrida's Judéïtés

By Hollander, Dana | Philosophy Today, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

Is Deconstruction a Jewish Science? Reflections on "Jewish Philosophy" in Light of Jacques Derrida's Judéïtés


Hollander, Dana, Philosophy Today


In 1920, Franz Rosenzweig published a pamphlet entitled "Of Bildung There Is No End" ("Bildung und kein Ende"), in which he sought-during the time in which he was involved in founding the Jewish Lehrhaus in Frankfurt-to take stock of the meaning and aims of Jewish Bildung (education, formation) for his time. For Rosenzweig, to undertake such a task required asking the question, "What is the Jew?" or "What is the Jewish human being?", and doing so in a way that sidestepped the parochial assumptions that undergirded organized Jewish life-those assumptions, for instance, that centered on Judaism as a political or cultural enterprise understandable only with reference to mainstream culture, whether it posed as an alternative or a supplement to that culture, or whether it proposed a way into that cultureRosenzweig names as examples both "Zionists" and "assimilationists." For Rosenzweig's purposes, the "Jewish human being" "does not mean a delimitation [Abgrenzung] against other kinds of humanity [andere Menschlichkeiten]." While Germanness [Deutschtum] "necessarily delimits itself against other Volkstiimer [nations, peoples]," such that a German cannot be at the same time a "Frenchman" or an "Englishman" and "the Germanness of the Jewish human being excludes his simultaneous Frenchness or Englishness," the Jew is a human being strictly insofar as he is a Jew, and a Jew insofar as he is a human being.1 Thus, while it could be a legitimate question-and had indeed been pursued, in a Hegelian vein, as a legitimate question-what the "connections" are between Germanness and humanity or universal human history, a pursuit of the kind that might lead to philosophico-historical speculations about the German contribution to the career of absolute spirit, for Judaism such a question would be nonsensical. No "connections" can be revealed or established between Judaism and humanity; the two are co-extensive, Rosenzweig writes.

We have here, in compact form, and with an emphasis on its consequences for what in contemporary parlance is known as Jewish "identity," a version of Rosenzweig's classic retrieval and reappropriation of the concept of Jewish election, understood not as a particularism but in its universal significance.2

Now, Rosenzweig himself will go on to specify against what Judaism, instead, is indeed delimited-namely the Christian and the pagan human being, in accordance with his dualistic schema, in the Star of Redemption, of the Christian and the Jewish paths that emerge from a pagan, mythic pre-history. But I would like, for my present purposes, to leave this aside in order to build on Rosenzweig's notion of Jewishness as a difference without delimitation, as a different kind of difference.

The contemporary scholar of German-Jewish thought Willi Goetschel has made significant strides towards figuring out what the consequences of this idea might be for the category of "Jewish philosophy." Whether one can legitimately speak of a "Jewish philosophy" is of course a long-standing question. Traditional answers have ranged from pointing to the medieval context as the birthplace of, and privileged locus for, Jewish philosophy; to defining Jewish philosophy in terms of "philosophies of Judaism," i.e., as consisting of philosophical analyses of Jewish traditions and phenomena; to philosophical inquiry, from a Jewish point of view, into classic religio-philosophical themes, such as the relationship of faith and reason; to the wider range of "expressions of Jewish reflection, secular and religious," Paul Mendes-Flohr has recently suggested, that could be taken as one of the specifically modern contributions to the project of Jewish philosophizing.3 In his 1994 article on the notion of "Jewish Philosophy"4 Goetschel calls attention to the fact that this question always has a normative dimension, both for Judaism and for philosophy.

Goetschel takes as his conceptual starting point the question of Jewish emancipation as it gets posed in Lessing's "Nathan the Wise. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Deconstruction a Jewish Science? Reflections on "Jewish Philosophy" in Light of Jacques Derrida's Judéïtés
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.