"Sinners Who Find Religion": Advancement of Litigation Expenses to Corporate Officials Accused of Wrongdoing

By Radin, Stephen A. | The Review of Litigation, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

"Sinners Who Find Religion": Advancement of Litigation Expenses to Corporate Officials Accused of Wrongdoing


Radin, Stephen A., The Review of Litigation


I. INTRODUCTION

Recent decisions in Delaware-"the Mother Court of corporate law"1 and the state whose "rich abundance of corporate law"2 guides courts throughout the country due to "the special expertise and body of case law developed in the Delaware Chancery Court and the Delaware Supreme Court"3-address an important but infrequently discussed corporate governance issue: charter, bylaw, and indemnification or employment agreement provisions that mandate advancement of attorneys' fees and other defense costs for corporate directors, officers, and employees accused of wrongdoing by the corporation or by federal or state law authorities.

These recent decisions repeatedly have rejected efforts by corporations that have promised mandatory advancement to disavow those promises due to the alleged-and in some cases admitted or proven-wrongful nature of the conduct for which advancement is sought. As the Delaware Court of Chancery colorfully has put it, corporations that adopt mandatory advancement provisions and then, after drawing "harsh conclusions about the integrity and fidelity of the corporate official seeking advancement,"4 defend against claims for mandatory advancement are like the "sinner who suddenly finds religion": "[c]ontent to adopt advancement and indemnification bylaws drafted with holes large enough to drive a truck through, the . . . company . . . suddenly 'finds religion'-insisting on a rigorous interpretation of its loosely written bylaws."5

The underlying principles, as stated by the Delaware Supreme Court as recently as November 17, 2005, in Homestore, Inc. v. Tafeen,6 are simple:

Indemnification encourages corporate service by capable individuals by protecting their personal financial resources from depletion by the expenses they incur during an investigation or litigation that results by reason of that service . . . .

Advancement is an especially important corollary to indemnification as an inducement for attracting capable individuals into corporate service. Advancement provides corporate officials with immediate interim relief from the personal out-of-pocket financial burden of paying the significant on-going expenses inevitably involved with investigations and legal proceedings . . . .7

The limited and narrow focus of an advancement proceeding precludes litigation of the merits of entitlement to indemnification for defending one self in the underlying proceedings. If it is subsequently determined that a corporate official is not entitled to indemnification, he or she will have to repay the funds advanced.8

Courts reach this result even where the director, officer, or employee receiving advancement does not have the resources required to repay the amounts advanced-often hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in some cases millions of dollars.

The Homestore litigation illustrates the requirement that corporations honor agreements to advance expenses under as harsh a set of circumstances as possible. The case involved a request for advancement by Peter Tafeen, a former officer of Homestore, Inc., for attorneys' fees incurred in connection with criminal and civil proceedings brought against him following an accounting restatement. The Supreme Court affirmed a Court of Chancery judgment ordering Homestore to advance over $3.9 million in defense costs.9 This award included, as has been the practice in indemnification and advancement cases in Delaware since the Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Stifel Financial Corp. v. Cochran,10 the attorneys' fees incurred by Tafeen in successfully enforcing his right to advancement-so called "fees on fees."11 The court also awarded pre-and post-judgment interest at the rate of seven percent, totaling $206,015.84 through the date of the Court of Chancery's judgment plus $756.40 per day during the appeal,12 in accordance with "settled Delaware law" providing for "prejudgment interest... as a matter of right."13

The Court of Chancery and the Supreme Court rejected allegations that "'Tafeen purchased an expensive home in Florida, a state that has extremely protective 'homestead' provisions against creditor claims,' in order to shelter assets, thus avoiding repayment should Tafeen's claims ultimately be found to be nonindemnifiable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"Sinners Who Find Religion": Advancement of Litigation Expenses to Corporate Officials Accused of Wrongdoing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.