The New School Finance Litigation: Acknowledging That Race Discrimination in Public Education Is More Than Just a Tort

By Morgan, Denise C. | Northwestern University Law Review, Fall 2001 | Go to article overview

The New School Finance Litigation: Acknowledging That Race Discrimination in Public Education Is More Than Just a Tort


Morgan, Denise C., Northwestern University Law Review


In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court suggested justice demands that states treat public education as a communal resource to be distributed "on equal terms" with respect to race.' Indeed, the Court's famous phrase-"[s]eparate educational facilities are inherently unequal"--could imply that misdistribution of that essential resource should entitle plaintiffs to a judicial remedy even in the absence of proof of misconduct by school officials. The Brown Court's holding is consistent with the Aristotelian conception of distributive justice, which provides that resources must be allocated among the members of a political community so that "[e]quality for the people involved will be the same as for the things involved."3 That moral theory does not require the use of blind quotas, but rather mandates that the allocation of shared resources be justifiable by fixed and important criteria. The Supreme Court's flirtation with distributive justice approaches in education discrimination cases was very short lived, however. Since IMAGE FORMULA4

Brown, the Court has applied corrective justice-which requires proof of wrongful conduct rather than evidence of unjustified disparate harm to trigger a right to a remedy-in all similar cases. Aristotle's classic definition of corrective justice requires that "when one is wounded and the other wounds him ... the judge tries to restore the [profit and] loss to a position of equality, by subtraction from [the offender's] profit."5 Unfortunately, the Court's corrective approach to education discrimination cases has neither brought about racially integrated public schools nor resulted in equal distribution of educational resources by race.6

This Article contends that the Supreme Court's initial distributive approach to adjudicating claims of education discrimination is more appropriate to resolving those cases than the corrective course the Court has employed since Brown. The two theories of justice supply different procedural rules for producing just outcomes-they have no substantive content. Aristotle did not specify what constitutes wrongful conduct or unjustified disparate harm-nor did he explain when it is appropriate to use one form of justice or the other. To determine which procedural approach is more likely to result in a substantively just outcome in any given case, one must consider what empirical circumstances the procedure will be used to evaluate. Distributive justice best suits education discrimination cases because the experience of discrimination, and the far-ranging and long-lasting equality harms that result from it, simply cannot be addressed within the framework of corrective justice. This is especially true of discrimination on the basis of race and in the allocation of community resources, like public education, which are necessary to ensure full and equal membership in a democratic political community. Although distributive education discrimination suits cannot be successfully litigated under the federal Constitution as it is currently interpreted, the implementing regulations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which embody a distributive approach, provide a legal basis for distributive relief.8 IMAGE FORMULA6

At a time in United States history when there is still a significant racial gap in standardized test scores,9 the remedies in many desegregation cases have been exhausted,10 affirmative action programs in educational institutions are under attack," and programs for non-English speaking K-12 stuIMAGE FORMULA8

dents and remedial programs for college students are being scaled back or eliminated,12 it is particularly important to explore distributive approaches to ensure that students of color have a chance for equal public education. Title VI implementing regulation education discrimination cases offer a new and promising way to pursue that goal. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The New School Finance Litigation: Acknowledging That Race Discrimination in Public Education Is More Than Just a Tort
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.