Psychiatrists' Documentation of Informed Consent: A Representative Survey

By Schachter, Debbie; Kleinman, Irwin | Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, June 2006 | Go to article overview

Psychiatrists' Documentation of Informed Consent: A Representative Survey


Schachter, Debbie, Kleinman, Irwin, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry


Objective: To review psychiatrists' documentation of informed consent and present data on Canadian psychiatrists' attitudes and practices regarding documentation of the informed consent process.

Method: We surveyed a stratified random sample of psychiatrists practising in Ontario, using a mailed self-report questionnaire.

Results: The response rate was 72%. Among respondents, 63% routinely documented the consent process, with younger respondents reporting more documentation than older ones. Although most respondents (77%) favoured recording the consent process, only 11% felt signed consent forms were necessary.

Conclusion: There are differences in the self-reported documentation behaviour of younger and older psychiatrists. Psychiatrists should document the consent process in the clinical record.

(Can J Psychiatry 2006;51:438-444)

Information on funding and support and author affiliations appears at the end of the article.

Clinical Implications

* Many psychiatrists do not routinely document the consent process.

* Older psychiatrists are reminded to document the consent process.

* Psychiatrists do not favour the use of signed consent forms for antipsychotic medication.

Limitations

* The participation rate was only 72%.

* The survey was conducted prior to widespread use of atypical antipsychotic medication.

* Data are needed regarding current documentation practices.

Key Words: informed consent, documentation, antipsychotic medication, health record

Abbreviations used in this article

APA American Psychiatric Association

CI confidence interval

CME continuing medical education

EPSE extrapyramidal side effect

OR odds ratio

TD tardive dyskinesia

Medical practitioners obtain informed consent for treatment prior to all medical interventions. This process reflects our respect for the autonomy of the individual. The elements of informed consent are that the patient has the capacity or ability to consent, that the individual has received an adequate disclosure of the relevant information, and that the patient provides consent voluntarily (1). The informed consent process gives patients information about the nature of the proposed treatment, the benefits and risks of the proposed treatment, and the benefits and risks of alternative treatments, including the option of no treatment. The standard of disclosure is to disclose the information that a reasonable patient in the patient's situation would want to have to make an informed decision (2,3). Canadian judicial decisions have stated that all material risks need to be disclosed as part of the informed consent disclosure (3,4). Informed consent therefore permits patients to make treatment decisions according to their own values and beliefs.

The informed consent process for antipsychotic medications is particularly important and complex, for several reasons. First, many patients for whom antipsychotic medications are prescribed have schizophrenia. Although many patients with schizophrenia are able to participate in medical decision making, the severity of their symptoms may reduce the ability of some patients to understand the information presented during the informed consent process (5,6).

Second, both the classical and the newer antipsychotic medications have serious side effects associated with their long-term use (7). The classical antipsychotic medications have a range of side effects, including prominent EPSEs such as TD, a potentially irreversible movement disorder that affects about 25% of patients (8,9). Because of this potentially serious side effect, the APA specifically recommended that information about TD be included in the informed consent process (8). Even though the newer atypical antipsychotic medications hold the promise of fewer EPSEs and a reduced risk of TD, they have been associated with serious metabolic and cardiac difficulties and significant weight gain (7). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Psychiatrists' Documentation of Informed Consent: A Representative Survey
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.