Teaching the Bible at Virginia Seminary in Late Modern Times

By Cook, Stephen L. | Anglican Theological Review, Winter 2002 | Go to article overview

Teaching the Bible at Virginia Seminary in Late Modern Times


Cook, Stephen L., Anglican Theological Review


The course description for my introductory, year-long Old Testament Interpretation course here at Virginia Theological Seminary opens: "An introduction to interpreting the Old Testament for our times, a period extending from modernist challenges to late modern confusions." I think it is wise for an attempt to reflect on an approach for teaching the Bible in today's seminary setting to proceed from some such initial characterization of biblical study's twentieth-century development as is hinted at in this description. I would thus like to begin this essay by briefly sketching such a characterization. A basic starting place would have to be the modernist challenges to which I refer in the description-challenges which, of course, have their roots in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

Modernist, that is "higher," or "historical," criticism of the Bible, though it had earlier precursors, emerged full-blown with the Enlightenment's focus on reason and the Age of Evolution's focus on change over time and through history. Appearing in 1878, Julius Wellhausen's Prolegomena galvanized and spearheaded higher criticism's challenge, a challenge that may even be described as an onslaught. "Onslaught" sounds all negative, and that would be an unfair characterization. Modern criticism's positive achievements are undeniable. Among them are a tremendous new precision in biblical analysis, an impressive illumination of ancient biblical culture and society, so distant from our own, and a profound appreciation of the historical and human character of the Bible. Yet, modern criticism also gave rise to tremendous frustration and fear, particularly in America. The reasons for this reaction need to be uncovered so that we can become more clear about whether, and in what ways, the reaction of fear and anger might be justified.

The influence of modern biblical criticism in America became serious by the first few decades of the twentieth century, when tremendously painful denominational, cultural and political fissures erupted. The famous Scopes "Monkey" trial of 1925 is a prominent example of these fissures. Biblical authority and scientific humanism severed and collided as William Jennings Bryan debated Clarence Darrow over the illegality of the teaching of evolution in the Tennessee public schools. The teaching of John Thomas Scopes occasioned the trial, but the issues at stake were much larger than his pedagogy. The trial showcases the agonizing divides in America over the impact of modernism.

William Jennings Bryan's words in an earlier, 1923 speech reveal how caustically many Americans experienced modernism. "Give the modernist three words, `allegorical,' `poetical,' and `symbolically,'" Bryan opined, "and he can suck the meaning out of every vital doctrine of the Christian Church and every passage in the Bible to which he objects."1 Bryan is objecting, angrily, to be sure, to a real and clear tendency in modernist biblical criticism. As this quotation of Bryan reflects, modernist criticism discounts the Bible as a literal and historical report of what it narrates. That is the scandal for Bryan. In place of the Bible's value as a report or "witness" is substituted its value as a "source" that reveals to us the creative religious interpretations of life made by the authors of its building blocks.

Now, part of my own scholarship is to strive to appreciate and illuminate the dense literary richness of the biblical text. Thus, I do not rush to endorse Bryan's literalism. My VTS colleague, Ellen Davis, who has done much scholarly work on the literary character of the Bible, concurs. Bryan's remark helpfully castigates any attempt to domesticate the Bible as a mere product of creativity in order to make an end run around its authority. However, a symbolic and semantic richness can often be an inherent property of the biblical text, not an evasive construal of it as colorful religious expression. Attention to poetics and to the symbolical dimension of the text in these cases may be essential for identifying the Bible's actual literal sense. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Teaching the Bible at Virginia Seminary in Late Modern Times
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.