Nondiscrimination or Secular Orthodoxy? Religious Freedom and Breach of Contract at Tufts University

By Hu, Victor T. | Texas Review of Law & Politics, Fall 2001 | Go to article overview

Nondiscrimination or Secular Orthodoxy? Religious Freedom and Breach of Contract at Tufts University


Hu, Victor T., Texas Review of Law & Politics


I. INTRODUCTION

Institutions of higher education have struggled with the concept of "ordered liberty" seemingly even longer than the Supreme Court.' Many recognize freedoms of speech, expression, and association as essential to the health and function of a democratic polity and society. In the educational context, however, few concur on how best to balance the need for an environment of tolerance and mutual respect with individual students' rights and freedoms. While constitutional jurisprudence provides some guidelines for state universities,2 private schools are largely given a free hand in their efforts to balance diversity with civility. The result of the modern college's balancing act, particularly since the advent of political correctness, often manifests itself in speech codes; antiharassment regulations; and, in particular, "nondiscrimination policies."

Understandable concerns animate proponents of nondiscrimination policies. While the school administration serves to provide an environment conducive to both free inquiry and expression, advocates say such legitimate interests are undermined when students manifest bigotry and discrimination to create an atmosphere of exclusion and intolerance. While schools cannot regulate private attitudes, they certainly can and should limit speech or conduct which acts to defeat their respective educational missions. From there, it is almost a step back to affirm the schools' right to condition students' access to resources-such as organizational funds or use of the schools' facilities-via neutral, across-the-board nondiscrimination policies.

But who is to regulate the application of such policies? Can they be used to defeat legitimate student freedoms or expectations? Critics see in such regulations the shadowy outlines of a mainstream, politically correct orthodoxy, defined by a cultural agenda, which serves to restrict fundamental liberties and silence unpopular voices. A recent controversy highlights the issues at stake.

At Tufts University on April 13, 2000, the Tufts Community Union Judiciary (TCUJ) "de-recognized" the Tufts Christian Fellowship (TCF) for refusing to allow a non-heterosexual student who considered homosexual relationships biblically permissible to run for a student leadership position within the group." The decision was based on a perceived violation of the school's nondiscrimination policies.6 The case was eventually reversed on procedural grounds, but the circumstances leading up to it, and the subsequent controversy which embroiled the campus and much of academia, bring into sharp relief one of the critical issues in higher education today-the clash between religious freedom and nondiscrimination policies in the private educational institutions of modern America.

The Tufts incident is not an isolated case. In the past few years, no fewer than six other colleges and universities have confronted this issue.' Using the events at Tufts as a case study, this article will explore the implications of nondiscrimination policies as they are applied to student religious groups at private universities. I will argue that, while nondiscrimination policies may be promulgated simply to promote more inclusive student organizations, their inclusion of specified clauses facially discriminate against and legislate organized religious traditions and beliefs. In addition, private universities can apply and have applied them to restrict religious students' freedoms of speech and expressive association; to dictate the organization, running, and membership of religious groups; and to punish students who adhere to their faith in the face of school policies.

. Furthermore, this article will argue that private schools essentially should be allowed to follow the dictates of their charters and policies without government interference, but nondiscrimination policies-under the influence of the mainstream, politically correct campus orthodoxy of the day-- have provided an indirect "backdoor" method for universities to constrain religious freedoms in a way that defeats the reasonable ex ante expectations of their students. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Nondiscrimination or Secular Orthodoxy? Religious Freedom and Breach of Contract at Tufts University
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.