The Road to the Tribunal and Beyond: International Commercial Arbitration and United States Courts

By Karamanian, Susan L. | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Road to the Tribunal and Beyond: International Commercial Arbitration and United States Courts


Karamanian, Susan L., The George Washington International Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

United States courts recognize the strong federal policy favoring arbitration of disputes involving international commerce. Enforcing parties' agreements on the forum and rules for resolving potential disputes has been praised as encouraging orderliness and predictability, which are important to international business.1 Arbitration allows parties engaged in international business to remove a potential dispute from a possibly hostile local judicial forum or one unfamiliar with the problem at issue.2 Deference to arbitration has also been lauded as providing a healthy respect for the parties' written promises-even if that means a neutral tribunal, situated outside of the United States, applies foreign law to resolve a dispute.3

It is paradoxical that the very courts that embrace the concept of arbitration spend considerable time and resources addressing complex issues that arise solely because the parties elect a non judicial dispute resolution procedure. As a result of statutory mandate, or at times due to their own devices, U.S. courts have become imbedded in the international arbitration process. Courts frequently determine whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable and, if so, whether the agreement covers the referenced dispute. If arbitration is appropriate, courts may order that arbitration occur in a specific location and designate the arbitrators, the issues to be arbitrated, and the applicable law. On occasion, courts resolve the propriety of interim measures in aid of arbitration. If competing policy concerns arise, such as the need to have all bankruptcy-- related matters decided in a single forum or if state law issues or federalism principles come into play, the courts decide the prevailing interest.

Furthermore, U.S. courts are authorized to confirm international commercial arbitration awards and reduce them to judgments. A challenge to an award may prompt judicial review of the arbitration proceedings to determine if the award should not be enforced or if enforcement should be deferred. A court may be asked to consider litigation relating to the award, for example, a proceeding to vacate an award filed in the country where the arbitration was conducted. Also, after the parties have gone to the expense of arbitration, a court may consider the propriety of arbitration in the first instance.

More than thirty years have passed since the United States acceded to the principal convention on international arbitration, the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,4 and enacted Chapter 2 of the United States Arbitration Act (commonly referred to as the Federal Arbitration Act or "FAA") to implement the New York Convention.5 The U.S. Senate was urged to accede to the New York Convention and enact the Convention Act "because the people engaged in foreign trade consider arbitration . . . a very economical and speedy way of settling commercial disputes."6 Arbitration would provide prompt dispute resolution without requiring American businesses to deal with unfamiliar foreign judicial procedures.7 The U.S. Supreme Court, in its first case to address the Convention Act,8 praised the New York Convention. The Convention served "to unify the standards by which agreements to arbitrate are observed and arbitral awards are enforced in the signatory countries."9

An established body of law has emerged regarding certain aspects of the New York Convention, as implemented in the United States through the Convention Act, and as to other relevant FAA provisions.10 Nevertheless, with courts regularly tackling new, sometimes complex, issues relating to the Convention in the context of a federal system, the judicial landscape is far from clear.11

This Article analyzes international commercial arbitration in U.S. courts with an emphasis on the Convention. The interaction between the Convention Act and the Domestic FAA and between the FAA, in general, and the Convention's substantive provisions can best be described as a tangled-web. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Road to the Tribunal and Beyond: International Commercial Arbitration and United States Courts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.