Framing American Politics/New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen

By Taylor, Matthew P. | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

Framing American Politics/New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen


Taylor, Matthew P., Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


Framing American Politics. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell, eds. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005. 248 pp. $27.95.

New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Philip N. Howard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 265 pp. $65.00 hbk. $23.99 pbk.

These two books provide insightful perspectives about different areas of political communication research, all at varying levels of conceptual development. Considering them in comparison offers valuable insight into how key political communication research approaches develop and mature and helps explain why particular methodological designs are favored over others. Callaghan and Schnell's edited work demonstrates how scholars have come to a more refined understanding of framing over time, in this case viewing it as a specific research paradigm rather than an overarching theory. Howard's shrewd examination of political uses of new technology could have important implications for future theorizing about electronic campaigning.

In Framing American Politics, Callaghan and Schnell gather an impressive group of scholars from the framing debate to examine the utility of this concept in macro-level studies of how frames are set by "political elites" and micro-level studies of how these frames affect individual consumers of political content. Framing is understood here as a "top down" process whereby "political elites, such as the news media, politicians, interest groups, and other political players, define the political space and erect the boundaries within which a public policy issue will be considered." Callaghan and Schnell clearly stake their turf in this typically muddied field of research. They provide a solid framework for this volume with a concise yet cogent introduction and a solidly argued conclusion. Framing is treated as a "coherent research paradigm," and the book focuses on the aspects of this concept considered most relevant to political communication. This is not another discussion of "What is framing?" as much as it is an exploration of the question, "Why is this concept relevant to our discipline?"

Considering the overall strength of the contributors to this book and the coherence of the arguments presented, Framing American Politics is a work best considered in its entirety. While most of the chapters could stand on their own merit, the collective volume offers a compelling and balanced argument for why framing should continue to inform political communication studies. The book also brings to light the central issues that scholars, even with their more refined understanding of framing, must grapple with in order to truly advance this particular line of inquiry. Key among these issues is finding a more effective way to learn from studies of framing effects. Callaghan discusses the "file-drawer" problem, where members of the academic community hesitate to publish the results of quantitative work that fail to support the hypothesized relationships. This challenges the assumption that only studies that locate statistical significance can advance the framing debate. The book's discussion of framing effects illustrates how these types of studies can be both promising and problematic.

Schnell and Callaghan's own effects research in chapter 5, "Terrorism, Media Frames, and Framing Effects," does well to support the book's overall focus on a framing paradigm within which political communication scholars can incorporate both micro- and macro-level considerations. They use content analysis and experimental research to explore the effect of changing news coverage of the gun control debate following the September 11 attacks. They explore how focusing events contribute to changes in news frames, thereby merging two important political communication concepts. There seems to be a natural link between this study and the frame-changing model that was proposed in 2004 by Chyi and McCombs, although this study is not referenced in the chapter. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Framing American Politics/New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.