Decentralization and the Party System in Venezuela

By Lalander, Rickard | Ibero-americana, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

Decentralization and the Party System in Venezuela

Lalander, Rickard, Ibero-americana


On the December 3, 1989, Venezuelans for the first time in the country's history went to the polls to directly elect their local and regional political leaders. An important decentralization process was subsequently initiated with the elections of municipal mayors and state governors. Since then, a number of non-traditional political parties have emerged and developed, like the socialist MAS (Movimiento Al Socialismo) and Causa R (Causa Radical).1 These two parties have triumphed in several municipalities and federal states in the elections of mayors and governors, thus seriously threatening the almost hegemonic position of the two Venezuelan traditional parties - i.e. social democratic AD (Acción Democrática) and Christian democratic COPEI (Comité de Organización Político Electoral Independiente). Both AD and COPEI, the country's main political organizations since its democratization in 1958, have by tradition been strongly centralized parties. For more than three decades they dominated national politics, often through strategic pacts and alliances. Between 1973 and 1988, the two parties together captured between 80% and 93% of the total votes cast in every presidential election. With the municipal, regional and national elections in 1998 and 2000, the political panorama underwent even more dramatic changes. Several entirely new political parties have emerged, most notably the MVR (Movimiento V República) of current President Hugo Chávez Frías, but also parties like Proyecto Venezuela, with roots in the industrial state of Carabobo and its capital Valencia, and Primero Justicia, rooted in the greater Caracas area. A fundamental hypothesis in this study is that the decentralization process has contributed strongly to changes in the structure of the Venezuelan party system. A main purpose here is therefore to examine these changes within the post-1989 party system. Since we deal with a two-party system rupture, some words are needed on the conditions party systems tend to collapse. Henry Dietz and David Myers present a three-part model on the probabilities of party system collapse or weakening.

1. Some kind of acute and long-lived crisis (e.g. economic or social),

2. The parties of the system are perceived as incapable to confront the crisis, and:

3. An alternative party or leader is considered as attractive as an option.

The authors suggest that a collapse of a party system is most likely when a combination of these factors occur (Dietz & Myers 2003:3). I argue that these ideas do not conflict with the implications of a decentralization reform on a party system, since the first two factors can function as a pressure for reform. Furthermore, once introduced decentralization, local and regional leaders can be perceived as options to the previously dominant party/parties.

Three fundamental conditions are often mentioned while discussing decentralization: the existence of territorial units to administrate, the right of the citizens to select their own regional/local political leaders, and the auto-financing capacity of the distinct political-territorial unities. Decentralization in the Latin American countries2 was probably introduced both as a result of an increasing political discontent among the population as the economic crisis deepened, and as important steps in the reforms of State democratization. At the same time, multilateral banks also pronounced strong pressure for decentralization as a basic condition when economic support was given. In this continental context Peter Spink concludes that the Venezuelan decentralization process has been one of the more successful ones in the continent, and stands out as the most powerful as for immediate impacts (Spink 1998:142-144).


From a democratic point of view, post-1958 Venezuela has shown some basic characteristics of a democratic system, such as party and organization plurality, right for the citizens to vote and a judicial system independent from the government. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Decentralization and the Party System in Venezuela


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.