United States Trade Relations with Muslim Countries

By Hasnat, Baban | The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

United States Trade Relations with Muslim Countries


Hasnat, Baban, The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies


The author provides a descriptive and analytic examination of the nature, magnitude, and structure of U.S. trade with Muslim countries. From the U.S. point of view, two-way trade with Muslim countries is small in dollar terms: the U.S. is a more critical market to Muslim countries than the imports from Muslim countries are to the U.S., except for oil and gas. The U.S. imports roughly one-third of its petroleum from Muslim countries, whereas its non-petroleum trade deficit with Muslim countries is only about $15 billion. Although trade disputes with Muslim countries are rare, and several Muslim countries benefit from free or preferential trade agreements with the U.S., the author lists others whose exports cannot compete in the U.S. market against rival producers under present U.S. trade policies.

Key Words: U.S. international trade, bilateral trade agreements, World Trade Organization, oil, natural gas, textiles,

I. Introduction

An issue of great concern in the United States over the last few years has been its relationship with Muslim countries. The September 11 terrorist attacks, followed by U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the nation-building effort there by the U.S. after the wars, have generated interest in public forums and academic circles on the U.S. relation with Muslim countries. While there is a considerable literature relating to U.S. political, energy and strategic interests in Muslim countries, particularly in the Middle East (see, for example, Ross 2005), few studies focus on the trade relation with the Muslim world. This is surprising since the U.S. has undertaken several initiatives in recent years to enhance and strengthen economic ties with Muslim countries. This paper plans to fill this gap by examining the U.S. trade relations with those nationss. More specifically, it provides a descriptive and analytic examination of the current nature, magnitude and structure of U.S. trade with them.

There are important reasons to examine this topic. After 9/11, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick declared that the promotion of trade relations would be one of the central weapons of America's campaign to combat terrorism (cited in Lael and Litan 2003). President Bush spoke in even stronger terms: "The terrorists attacked the World Trade Center, and we will defeat them by expanding and encouraging world trade" (quoted in Lael and Litan 2003). After its military victories in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Bush administration has assigned trade policy a major role to combat terrorism and win peace. During the U.S.-Bahrain free trade agreement signing ceremony in September 2004, Robert Zoellick further declared that "a contest for the soul of Islam" is raging in Muslim countries, and that the U.S. wanted to help by promoting trade that generates jobs and reduces poverty (http://www.ustr.gov/). With this as context, what do we know about the U.S. trade relationship with Muslim countries?

Several survey results find a disquieting view of the United States relationships with them. A recent survey result, jointly released by Public Agenda and Foreign Affairs magazine, showed that Americans are perplexed and anxious about their country's relation with the Muslim world (Arumi and Bittle 2005). According to the Public Agenda Confidence in the U.S. foreign policy index, nearly 64 percent gave the U.S. a "C" or worse in its relations with Muslim countries. Forty percent of the respondents claimed that they "worry a lot," followed by another 34 percent who claimed that they "worry somewhat," about a growing hatred of the U.S. in those countries. Indeed, in a survey conducted for a Georgetown University research project, 'Muslims in the American Public Square,' Zogby International reports that 38 percent of American Muslims believe that American foreign policy is hostile toward Islamic countries and Muslims (Project MAPS).

The existence of strong Muslim antipathy toward the United States, particularly since the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, is hardly new. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

United States Trade Relations with Muslim Countries
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.