Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases

By Stoutenborough, James W.; Haider-Markel, Donald P. et al. | Political Research Quarterly, September 2006 | Go to article overview

Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases


Stoutenborough, James W., Haider-Markel, Donald P., Allen, Mahalley D., Political Research Quarterly


The theoretical and empirical debate over the ability of the U.S. Supreme Court to influence public opinion through its decisions is far from settled. Scholars have examined the question using a variety of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence, but there is no theoretical consensus, nor are the empirical studies without methodological weaknesses. We enter this debate in an attempt to bring some clarity to the theoretical approaches, overcome some of the methodological shortcomings, and bring a yet unstudied issue area, Court decisions on gay civil rights, under scrutiny. We argue that the ability of Court decisions to influence public opinion is a function of the salience of the issue, the political context, and case specific factors at the aggregate level. At the individual level these factors are also relevant, but citizen characteristics must also be taken into consideration. Our analysis of aggregate level and individual level opinion does indeed suggest that Court decisions can influence public opinion. However, the ability of Court decisions to influence public opinion is conditional. Our findings lend support to the legitimation hypothesis and the structural effects model. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings and suggestions for future research.

In a representative democracy we are often concerned with the congruence of public preferences and the decisions of political institutions. Most often we expect that the decisions of institutions will be consistent with public preferences. However, we also know that the decisions of political institutions can influence the policy preferences of the public as well as public confidence in our political system and its institutions (Stimson 2004). When the focus has been on the Supreme Court, scholars have indeed suggested that the Court will defer to public opinion in deciding cases (e.g., Adamany 1973; Dahl 1957; Marshall 1989). However, the Court does not always defer to public opinion, and Court decisions may actually play a role in shaping public opinion (Franklin and Kosaki 1989; Hoekstra 1995; Johnson and Martin 1998; Marshall 1989; Petty and Cacioppo 1986). Indeed, many recent studies suggest that Court decisions might temporarily shape public opinion under certain conditions (see Hoekstra 2003, and Marshall 1989, for reviews). For example, citizens who have knowledge of a decision but also have low prior interest in the issue are most likely to be influenced by a decision (Hoekstra and Segal 1996; Petty and Cacioppo 1986). But scholars continue to debate the potential influence of the Court, the conditions under which influence is possible, and whether or not observed shifts in opinion following Court decisions can be directly attributed to a Court decision (e.g., Caldeira and Gibson 1992; Franklin and Kosaki 1989; Gibson, Caldeira, and Spence 2003; Hoekstra 1995, 2000; Hoekstra and Segal 1996; Johnson and Martin 1998). In part, the conflicting findings may be a result of researchers using different methods and examining opinion at either the individual level or the aggregate level only.

We join this debate by examining the potential influence of Court decisions in an issue area not yet explored, gay and lesbian civil rights. Although there have only been four significant decisions by the Court on gay civil rights, each decision had significant policy implications, and the most recent decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) appears to be playing a central role in shaping the national debate over gay rights and same-sex marriage. Our study expands the theoretical arguments of earlier research by more fully addressing the conditional influence of the Court. We also attempt to overcome some of the limitations of previous studies by examining the potential impact of multiple Court decisions on public opinion using both aggregate and individual level analysis-previous research has only examined opinion change at the individual or aggregate level, not both. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.