Strategic Organization Development: A Failure of True Organization Development

By Head, Thomas C. | Organization Development Journal, Winter 2006 | Go to article overview

Strategic Organization Development: A Failure of True Organization Development


Head, Thomas C., Organization Development Journal


Abstract

As we currently approach strategic organization development (the complete transformation of all systems in a coordinated fashion) there is little doubt that it represents nothing but a failure for "traditional" organization development. This is not to say strategic efforts are not valuable or successful. Rather it means that the organization failed to use organization development to prevent the need for such drastic actions. It is time we return to our roots and redefine strategic organization development as the proactive use of the field's techniques and philosophies to identify and correct problems before they become "life threatening."

Is strategic organization development a failure? Quite the contrary, as there are plenty of well documented case studies where, clearly, strategic organization development has proven highly successful. Rather, this author believes it is time that we recognize that strategic organization development is the result of an organization failing to use the age-old traditional methods of the field, as they were originally intended, that necessitates the need for strategic organization development. Perhaps it is knowing that strategic organization development exists that lulls the organization into the complacency that creates the need for the technique, much like an individual, believing a cure exists for everything, will engage in high risk behavior. Any physician, or sane person, will advocate Ben Franklin's old adage "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." It is time that organization development revisits its roots and re-conceptualizes strategic organization development from its present reactive cure paradigm towards a proactive force for prevention.

Cummings and Worley (2005) observe that as organizational external environments have grown in turbulence, organization development has been pushed into responding with increasing large scale, or strategic, practices. They continue by defining strategic organization development as "...efforts to improve both the organization's relationship to its environment and the fit between its technical, political, and cultural systems" (Cummings & Worley, 2005, p. 12). From their review of strategic organization development models these authors conclude "...that strategic change involves multiple levels of the organization and a change in its culture, is often driven from the top by powerful executives, and has important effects on performance" (p. 12). True strategic organization development is not something an organization can implement quickly. It has been suggested that the underlying culture change required to bring a company in line with its environment may take a minimum of 6 to 15 years of solid effort (Lau, Kilbourne, & Woodman (2003).

It is important to note that strategic organization development, at least in its traditional fashion, is a fairly rare occurrence and almost always the result of longterm management neglect as well as massive structural and cultural problems. Only truly large-scale disturbances create the need for an entity to implement strategic organization development change efforts. Such disturbances include forces such as the lifting of significant regulatory requirements, a new (externally hired) CEO charged with transformation, or a technological breakthrough (Cummings & Nathan, 1991). Tushman, Newman, and Romanelli (1986) added to this list by suggesting three more "triggers": a fundamental shift in an industry's competitive framework, significant movement in a product's life-cycle that necessitate a change in strategy, or an organization's significant change in size.

Significant issues, often beyond the control of the organization, do occur and will have a significant impact upon its systems. However it really is not these forces that create the need for strategic organization development, rather it is the organization's inability to proactively adapt correctly. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Strategic Organization Development: A Failure of True Organization Development
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.