Asylum and Culture: Comments on Khanna and Noll

By Piot, Charles | Texas International Law Journal, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

Asylum and Culture: Comments on Khanna and Noll


Piot, Charles, Texas International Law Journal


It's a pleasure to be able to comment on these two papers. They both engage the analysis of asylum in rich and provocative ways. My remarks will focus especially on the culture question-on the ways in which culture and asylum get tangled up with, and indeed co-produce, one another in asylum contexts. In so doing, I will draw not only on these two papers but also on work I have done on political (or "cultural") asylum cases involving female genital mutilation (FGM), especially the 1996 landmark Kasinga asylum case,1 for which I served as a (minor) expert witness.

Ranji Khanna's paper locates the figure of asylum, and the contemporary asylum seeker, within a nexus of broader theoretical categories (sovereignty, states of exception, biopolitical disciplinary regimes) and within a field of sites (the mental asylum, places of religious sanctuary) that bear family resemblance to the site of refuge for the asylum seeker today-the nation itself. She suggests that we think of political asylum less as refuge or sanctuary and more as reinscription of state power and sovereign authority, thus urging us to read the offer of hospitality (that is inherent to the granting of asylum) as an act of exclusion and violence-and a reassertion of state power. Asylum, Khanna argues, represents the right of institutions over bodies rather than of individuals over institutions or states. But more, she also asks us to consider thinking of asylum in its dystopic, biopolitical form as symptomatic of our times, as norm rather than exception, as universal condition. We are all refugees living in an "age of asylum."

Khanna also suggests that gendering the asylum seeker as paradigmatically female and theorizing the category asylum through a Marxist-feminist optic might cause us not only to acknowledge or bring into recognition that which often remains unrecognized-for the Marxist-feminist, "affective" or "immaterial" labor as well as the exclusions and violences of family and community, for the asylum seeker, the work she is performing for the sovereign and the violence to which she is subjected by the state-but also to explore the site of asylum as a doubled space of excess, desire and Utopian hope.

I find the analysis immensely suggestive, and simply want to extend its reach by raising some questions about some of its main points. First, I would like to hear more about how we get from the iron cage (or "melancholia") of the first half of the essay to the Utopian space of desire of the second? If, as Khanna suggests, asylum is saturated with state surveillance and control, how does one ever escape such disciplinary regimes to inhabit a more emancipatory space?

Second, Agamben seems to haunt this text but is never mentioned.2 Are not the disciplinary regimes of Agamben's concentration camp precisely those of the insane asylum, and is not the principle of the "state of exception become norm" that Agamben invokes so powerfully around the figure of the camp not also the point Khanna is trying to make for political asylum?

Moreover, what about that other contemporary sovereignty theorist, Achille Mbembe? He suggests in his work on "necropolitics"3 that we need today to supplement the biopolitical with the necropolitical, that sovereignty in today's world is inextricably linked with death-dealing and, thus, with the taking (as much as the granting) of life. Since domestic regimes of surveillance and incarceration and those of global war are so intimately connected in this post-9/11 world, and since the figure of the asylum seeker-clutched from the jaws of death by the offer of life and hospitality-is so implicated in such a world (as a transgressor of its boundaries), it would seem that thinking asylum through its relationship to the necropolitical might also be necessary. Indeed, does not the asylum seeker escape one form of necropolitics only to submit herself to another?

Third, I wonder about Khanna's periodizing moves, especially her characterization of the contemporary era. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Asylum and Culture: Comments on Khanna and Noll
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.