The Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem

By Jacobs, J. Bruce | The China Journal, January 2007 | Go to article overview

The Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem


Jacobs, J. Bruce, The China Journal


The Struggle Across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem, by Ramon H. Myers and Jialin Zhang. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2006. xii +168 pp. US$15.00 (paperback).

This is a poor book that claims to analyze the divide across the Taiwan Strait. Rather, it simply gives the perspectives of the Chinese side and could have been as easily published in Beijing as in Stanford, California. Its one possibly useful attribute is that it gives China's "feelings" and responses to various situations that have arisen over the years.

The unremitting, underlying theme is that Taiwan is Chinese. The book argues that the division between Mainlanders and Taiwanese "did not constitute a source of conflict in Taiwan's politics unless instigated by powerful, influential local elites" (p. 48). This ignores the facts that no such powerful local élites existed under a dictatorial regime that systematically discriminated against Taiwanese in all crucial spheres of the political system. From the movement of the Kuomintang government from China to Taiwan in late 1949 until the death of Chiang Ching-kuo in early 1988, Mainlanders always accounted for a majority of the members of the government's cabinet and the Kuomintang's Central Standing Committee despite accounting for less than 15 per cent of the population. A Taiwanese never held the position of premier or minister of foreign affairs, national defense, economics, education, finance or justice until after Lee Tenghui became president in 1988.

Some of assertions made are simply laughable. In no way did "[t]he majority of Taiwan's people welcome[] Jiang's conciliatory eight points" of 30 January 1995, which the authors provide in Appendix 6 (pp. 149-55). Further, although China rejected the so-called "1992 Consensus" ("One China, each defining it in their own way") at the time, the book now treats the so-called " 1992 Consensus" as fact, even though the originator of the term, Su Chi, has admitted that he made it up.

Basically, all of the blame for the division across the Taiwan Strait is laid on former President Lee Teng-hui and on President Chen Shui-bian. The book says, "From 1999 until 2006 the two regimes have not held direct talks" (p. 114). Yet the authors repeatedly fail to note that China refuses to talk unless Taiwan agrees to a "one China" policy first. Of course, such an agreement from the Taiwan side would give the game away before the discussions even started, something the book fails to note.

As a polemic, this book is filled with contradictions. Chapter 4 starts, "Taiwan's politics are not ethnic in nature as some Taiwan experts assert" (p. 45), yet a few pages later the book asserts, "By November 1999 it is clear from Table 1 that a decisive shift in ethnic identity had occurred after 1991" (p. 53). Later the book says, "At this time [2004], however, there was no immediate threat to Taiwan because missiles had been stationed across the strait for many years" (p. 89), but on the same page it says "Mainland Chinese officials then responded that if Taiwan's leadership held their referendum, that could cause a war" (pp. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.