Community College Faculty Rewards: Expectations and Incentives

By Payne, Tracy; Herndon, Susan et al. | Community College Enterprise, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview

Community College Faculty Rewards: Expectations and Incentives


Payne, Tracy, Herndon, Susan, McWaine, Lamar, Major, Claire, Community College Enterprise


The research investigates responsibilities of community college faculty and the rewards they may expect to receive for their efforts. Researchers surveyed community colleges in one Southern state. Survey results present disparities, and the authors make suggestions for bridging the gap between expectations and rewards.

Background

Recent national attention examines faculty rewards and incentives in higher education; however, little of the attention has focused on the community college. The notion exists that faculty members deserve reward based on activities they regularly engage in, particularly the kinds of activities that institutions value and wish to encourage. However, traditional reward structures such as grants and travel funds often favor research and scholarly activities, a circumstance with profound implications for the community college, which is often described as the teaching college.

In Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate (1990), Boyer encourages educators to broaden the notion of scholarship from discovery to include integration, application, and teaching, thus fostering teaching as a serious scholarly activity. The phrase "scholarship of teaching" has received frequent use since the publication of Boyer's work. It offers a new way of thinking about the work that faculty does, and it suggests that, like traditional research-based activities, teaching should be rewarded as a scholarly activity. Boyer makes the observation, however, that "today, on campuses across the nation, there is a recognition that the faculty reward system does not match the full range of academic functions and that professors are often caught between competing obligations" (p. 1). Boyer's work marks the beginning of an ongoing scholarly discussion about faculty roles and rewards.

The question arises whether the disjunction between rewards and functions also exists in community colleges. The focus of the following research was to determine what community college faculty responsibilities entail and what the current reward structures look like in the Alabama Community College System. As context for the study, a consideration of faculty workloads and faculty rewards at a national level becomes important.

Review of the literature

Faculty workloads

Cohen and Brawer (1989) address the issue of faculty workloads in the community college. For community college faculty, they conclude that "the number of hours taught (13-15) seems high when placed against the university faculty's 5-9 hours" (p. 74). However, the authors find that "both do spend the same amount of time on the job" (p. 74). Although community college instructors may spend as much time working as their peers, the nature of the work they perform is different; they spend little time conducting research and more time teaching students. Cohen and Brawer suggest that " many community college instructors would willingly spend more time in scholarly pursuits, as the university professors do, if they had fewer classes to meet" (p. 75).

The expectation that community college faculty focuses primarily on teaching is evident in the workload. Rifkin (1999) concurs with Cohen and Brawer that teaching consumes at least 15 hours per week of the instructors' time, compared to fewer hours for instructors from traditional four-year institutions and research universities. These faculty members also accumulate more hours of student contact through activities such as advising and tutoring than do their counterparts (Rifkin, 1999; A changing, 1998). Not only do they spend more time teaching students, but the students they teach are often unprepared academically for the demands of college (Rifkin, 1999). Therefore, community college faculty members must spend more time outside of their disciplines learning how to teach basic skills (Bundy, 2000).

Huber's extensive investigation into community college education has led to significant findings and recommendations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Community College Faculty Rewards: Expectations and Incentives
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.