"The Swamps of Myth . . . and Empirical Fishing Lines": Historiography, Narrativity, and the "Here and Now" in Graham Swift's Waterland

By Berlatsky, Eric | Journal of Narrative Theory, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

"The Swamps of Myth . . . and Empirical Fishing Lines": Historiography, Narrativity, and the "Here and Now" in Graham Swift's Waterland


Berlatsky, Eric, Journal of Narrative Theory


In recent debates over the proper methods to be pursued by practicing historians, the elusive chimera known as postmodernism has been raised consistently as either the key to a new practice of history that would help historians reach their aesthetic and creative potential or as the dangerous relativism that would dissolve the discipline of History altogether.1 "Postmodernist historiography," or constructivist historicism, has a deep and pervasive tie to narrative and narrative theory, largely because its central figure, Hayden White, is deeply interested in the ways in which the narrative form has affected the possibility of material reference in historical discourse. While constructivist and relativist skepticism towards the possibility of historical objectivity predate White substantially,2 the focus on narrative as a central barrier to objective reference is most archetypically represented by White's work. Although there have been some amendments to White's early radical position, his initial narrativism remains a powerful influence upon postmodern historiography, and a source of contention. Narrativism, in brief, is the belief that no "meaning" is inherent to a collection of historical facts and events retained or selected from the past. Rather, the act of narration itself is responsible for any sense of meaning or causality that links historical events together. In his well-known essay, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality," Hayden White rates that value as nearly nonexistent. White asks: "What wish is enacted, what desire is gratified, by the fantasy that real events are properly represented when they can be shown to display the formal coherency of a story?" (8). His sly indication that narrative's capacity to represent reality is, in fact, merely a desire and a fantasy and not an actual possibility portrays a common, though contested, viewpoint that offers the form of narrative itself as falsification, not explanation.

White's configuration of history's relationship to narrative is part of a wider movement in the humanities, known conventionally as "the linguistic turn," and influenced heavily by the insights of French poststructuralism. The generalized viewpoint of poststructuralism and the linguistic turn have themselves become par for the theoretical course, even hegemonic, in recent decades, and it would be redundant to reiterate them fully here. On a basic level, however, it is perhaps sufficient to say that the linguistic turn emphasizes the ways in which reference to the object of the past (or even the present) is impossible, that all of our experiences of reality (and particularly of history) are mediated by language and discourse, which are always and everywhere value-laden and ideological. Central to this "turn" is a more detailed and elaborate focus on the mediation of reality, so much so that the reality itself is often cited as a mere articulation of its mediation. Marshall McLuhan's "the medium is the message" is merely the most pithy expression of this widespread belief, which I will explore a bit more fully below. From this perspective, White's focus on narrative as it relates to history may, in this sense, be tied to Derrida's focus on the impossibility of climbing "outside the text" into a world of transparent referentiality, or Foucault's notion of history as a web of power-oriented discourses. Lyotard's identification of the postmodern with the "withdrawal of the real," (79) along with his observation that "objective" discourses like science (and history) have been reduced to "language games" is perhaps the clearest and most oft-cited correlation of postmodernism with the linguistic turn.

It is not my purpose in this essay to disregard the central and important insights of poststructuralism, or for that matter narrativist history itself. Rather, I wish to look at how a focus on history and representation almost purely from the point of view of the linguistic turn has subtracted from our sense of the past as accessible and "present" to us, not merely via discourses and narrative but materially as well, in the form of the referent. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"The Swamps of Myth . . . and Empirical Fishing Lines": Historiography, Narrativity, and the "Here and Now" in Graham Swift's Waterland
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.