How Can We Connect to U.S. History?

By Schneider, Debra; Threatt, Susan | Social Studies Review, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview

How Can We Connect to U.S. History?


Schneider, Debra, Threatt, Susan, Social Studies Review


Both of us teach United States history in two different northern California high schools of significantly different SES/demographics, in different districts and communities about 45 miles apart. We collaborate, plan, examine, assess student work, and we tell stories about our teaching lives over the phone, in emails, and at occasional monthly meetings. Because we rarely have time in the teaching year to work in long, uninterrupted blocks of time, when we write together, we sometimes take responsibilities for different sections of a paper after thorough discussion, outlining, and diagramming. We constructed this account of an emerging pattern of response to our assignment to connect a family member to United States history in that way. We have changed our students' names and do not reveal which of the two schools the students attend:

Irina: "We came here just a few years ago. How can we be connected to U.S. History?"

Anh: "My mom is Vietnamese and she immigrated here so she is not part of U.S. History."

Rose: "I can't do this because I don't have family. No, I mean no family from the 20th century. I mean, no one who is in history like we study in class."

Jim: "My grandmother was just a housewife. My grandfather drove a truck or something like that. We don't have any World War II generals in our family."

We know this collection of articles in the Social Studies Review is about women in history. As teachers of history, we also know that canonical accounts prior to the mid-20th century emphasized men's roles and did not fully represent the contributions of women. During the sixties, historians made a concerted effort to invite women and other previously excluded people to the history table (see Zinn, 1980). By the nineties, black feminists and gender theorists had identified a broader variety of possibilities for women than did a Western model of feminism (see Collins, 1990, Butler, 1990).

Two standards, the 5th and the 11th, specifically address women's changing roles in the United States in the 19th and 20th centuries. Despite this movement toward inclusion and variation, still-powerful ghosts of old versions lurk in the state-sanctioned canon. For example, the 11th grade U.S. history standards in the History-Social Science Framework (2005) still identify eight times as many men by name as women. Why Teddy Roosevelt by name as a Progressive and not Mary "Mother" Harris Jones, Ida B. Wells or Jane Addams in Standard 11.2.9? Why not Constance Baker Motley and Diane Nash alongside the names of Thurgood Marshall and James Farmer in Standard 11.10.4? Granted, a knowledgeable history teacher would most likely try to include these women in a comprehensive and inclusive study of 20th century U.S. history. But given the state-mandated testing emphases, there may be consequences for presenting other versions and broader possibilities than those explicitly and implicitly sanctioned by the state.

This project has not been about women, per se, but rather about those perspectives and processes that have contributed to their exclusion from United States history and the distortion of their potential. Therefore, our primary focus in this project was the state historical and social science analysis skills of historical research, evidence, and point of view which ask us to distinguish "between sound generalizations and misleading oversimplifications." It is our thought that a history that overemphasizes the accomplishments of any one group is just such an oversimplification.

For both of us, teaching involves on-going inquiry, intellectual challenge, and a profound sense of ethical and moral responsibility. We want our students to learn that the study and critique of historical versions can be helpful, far beyond axiomatic formulas, graduation requirements, and API indices. In fact, as classroom teachers we note that formulas and indices have the power to make ritualistic obstacle out of meaningful lesson. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Can We Connect to U.S. History?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.