China's Practice of Procuring Organs from Executed Prisoners: Human Rights Groups Must Narrowly Tailor Their Criticism and Endorse the Chinese Constitution to End Abuses

By Hemphill, Joan E. | Washington International Law Journal, March 2007 | Go to article overview

China's Practice of Procuring Organs from Executed Prisoners: Human Rights Groups Must Narrowly Tailor Their Criticism and Endorse the Chinese Constitution to End Abuses


Hemphill, Joan E., Washington International Law Journal


I. INTRODUCTION

In 2001, Chinese surgeon Dr. Wang Guoqi testified before the United States Congress that he performed more than 100 operations to remove skin and corneas from executed prisoners.1 Although the practice of procuring organs from prisoner cadavers is legal in China, Dr. Guoqi described ways in which prisoners were abused during the process.2 He emphasized one particular incident in 1995 that has "tortured [his] conscience to no end."3 The incident occurred in the Hebei Province, where Dr. Guoqi and a team of doctors were called to extract skin and kidneys from a prisoner's body.4 During the execution, the guard misfired his gun, shooting the prisoner several inches short of the target, and leaving him convulsing on the ground.5 Although the prisoner was still alive, the supervising official ordered the doctors to proceed with organ removal in a nearby ambulance.6 The prisoner continued to breathe even after both of his kidneys were extracted.7 While officials rushed the kidneys to medical units, Dr. Guoqi and his colleagues began to remove the skin from the prisoner's half-dead body.8 Hearing noises outside and fearing an attack from the prisoner's family, the doctors forced the mangled prisoner into a plastic bag, and left him to die.9 Haunted by this and other memories of prisoner abuse, Dr. Guoqi ultimately refused to participate in the organ-procurement practice.10 He was subsequently forced to submit a pledge not to expose his work, nor to reveal that organs are sold for profit by the Chinese government.11 When Dr. Guoqi left China in 2000, the Chinese government was still procuring organs from prisoner corpses at execution sites.12

Evidence of physical abuse, such as that witnessed by Dr. Guoqi,'3 has prompted international criticism of China's practice of procuring organs from executed criminals.14 Critics of China's organ-procurement practice assert that it compromises the legitimate administration of China's penal process, and results in brutal forms of prisoner abuse.15 Human rights groups press China to reform both the organ-procurement and death-penalty practices, but these efforts unnecessarily expand the scope of the issue beyond the elimination of prisoner abuse, and misguidedly promote China's adoption of international standards on human rights.16 For this reason, a new approach is needed to lend legal support to lobbying efforts, and to present the Chinese government with a more convincing case for reform.

Part II of this Comment outlines China's practice of procuring organs from prisoner cadavers, explaining the Chinese government's strong economic incentive to use prisoner organs for commercial purposes, and detailing human rights groups' criticisms of this practice. Part III asserts that human rights groups' current approach to reforming China's organ-procurement practice is ineffective because it relies on international standards and advocates for broad reforms. Part IV analyzes the legal framework behind China's organ-procurement practice, comparing the recent 2006 Provisions on the transportation of cadavers to China's 1984 Order on the utilization of prisoner corpses, and demonstrating how these laws fail to square with Chinese constitutional principles on human rights. Part V argues that the Chinese constitution must be fully implemented to modify and reform China's organ-procurement laws. Part VI recommends human rights groups target their criticisms at ending the most serious instances of prisoner abuse, and endorsing the application of Chinese constitutional human rights requirements to lobby more effectively for reforms. Part VII concludes this comment.

II. HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS ASSERT CHINA'S USE OF PRISONER ORGANS RESULTS IN ABUSE BECAUSE IT Is DRIVEN BY ECONOMIC INTERESTS AND AUTHORIZED BY DEFICIENT LAWS

In many parts of the world, there is a wide disparity between the demand and the supply of available transplant organs.17 Confronted with long waiting lists, and the close prospect of death, patients from around the globe are traveling to China to obtain transplant organs for a price. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

China's Practice of Procuring Organs from Executed Prisoners: Human Rights Groups Must Narrowly Tailor Their Criticism and Endorse the Chinese Constitution to End Abuses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.