A Comparative Study of the Effects of Taiwan-United States Employee Categorization on Supervisor Trust

By Hu, Hsiu-Hua | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, February 10, 2007 | Go to article overview

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Taiwan-United States Employee Categorization on Supervisor Trust


Hu, Hsiu-Hua, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


This study used a 2×2×2 within-subjects of scenario experiment design to examine the effects of 3 key employee categorization criteria - relationship (guanxi), loyalty and competence - on the trust attitudes of 217 Taiwan and 132 United States corporate managers. The results revealed that U.S. supervisors display cognition-based trust (reliability and competence) toward their subordinates, which is primarily based on each subordinate's level of competence, whereas Taiwan supervisors display affect-based trust (affectionate attachment) based on the closeness of their relationship with the subordinate. Limitations of the study and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Keywords: employee categorization, relationship (guanxi), loyalty, competence, supervisor trust.

Living in an age of information overload, one has to be able to separate the wheat from the chaff. For managers or supervisors, in the context of organizational behavior, this entails observing their subordinates in order to better understand and predict their performance. They then establish different types of interactive relationships as a basis for allocating limited resources to their subordinates (Cheng, 1995; Hsu, Cheng, & Huang, 2003; Hu, Hsu, & Cheng, 2004). These relationships are based on employee categorization and differential management style (Cheng, 1995; Deluga & Perry, 1994; Graen & Cashman, 1975).

Employee categorization in the Chinese corporate context is based on the distance of the relationship (guanxi) between a supervisor and the subordinate, and the employee's perceived level of loyalty and competence (Cheng, 1995). These three criteria have a significant influence on managerial behavior such as reward allocation, information sharing, and decision-making involvement (Hsu et al., 2003; Hu et al., 2004). Trust is another influential factor in the supervisor-subordinate relationship (Cheng) since it involves social personality attributes that help stabilize interpersonal exchange relationships in both social and corporate contexts (Cheng; Hsu et al.; Zucker, 1986).

Growing corporate globalization has spurred much research on managerial and organizational behavior across different national cultural contexts (Chen, 1995; Barley, 1989, 1994; Hofstede, 1993; Kim, Park, & Suzuki, 1990; Leung & Bond, 1984; Zhou & Martocchio, 2001). Prior research has highlighted differences in Chinese and Western management styles (Cheng, 1995; Redding, 1990; Westwood, 1997; Yang, 1995), which derive, in large part, from cultural values and social norms, as well as from the interactive relationship with subordinates (Leung & Bond). This study examined the effects of employee categorization by Taiwan (Chinese) and United States (Western) managers on supervisor trust for a better comparative understanding of supervisor-subordinate relationships.

EMPLOYEE CATEGORIZATION

The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory, introduced in the 1970s and revised and refined in the years since, conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered in the interaction between supervisors and subordinates (Graen, 1976; Graen & Cashman, 1975). Further LMX research has focused on the differential treatment by supervisors of individual subordinates (Gerstner & Day, 1997), with Dienesch and Liden (1986) determining that the exchange relationship is based on mutuality and characterized by affect, loyalty, and contribution.

Research has shown that the exchange relationship in the Chinese organizational context is also influenced by social cultural factors, in particular Confucianism, in terms of leadership, organizational culture, and work values, and is the key difference between Chinese and Western management styles (Cheng, 1995; Cheng & Liu, 1995; Redding, 1990; Westwood, 1997; Whitley, 1992). Regarding the Chinese differential style of management, Cheng identified the employee categorization criteria that Chinese supervisors use when interacting with their subordinates as follows:

Relationship (guanxi) Based on the differential mode of association and "relationshipism" in Chinese society (Chen, 1986; Fei, 1992; Huang, 1988, 1995; Yang, 1993, 1999), Cheng (1995) found that supervisors treat their subordinates in different ways according to the type of relationship (guanxi) that exists between them. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Taiwan-United States Employee Categorization on Supervisor Trust
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.