Biosophical Analysis of Ethics in Pharmaceutical Industry: Opportunities and Challenges

By Parhizgar, Susan S.; Parhizgar, Kamal Dean | Competition Forum, January 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Biosophical Analysis of Ethics in Pharmaceutical Industry: Opportunities and Challenges


Parhizgar, Susan S., Parhizgar, Kamal Dean, Competition Forum


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Our objectives in this article are to present an account of morality and ethicality that is systematic, accessible, and usable in bioscientific and biotechnologal endeavors. One of the objectives of this article is to introduce the ethical and moral perspectives of biosciences and biotechnologies in the pharmaceutical industry. These common core concepts will be explicated and grounded for the common benefit of the human race. Another objective of this article is to provide the theoretical and pragmatic knowledge needed in today's research and development in the fields of biosciences and biotechnology within the ethical and moral context of humanity.

Keywords: Bioethics, Biomoral, Biotechnology, Biosophy, Biophilia, Biotechnology, Lifesciences

INTRODUCTION

From ancient times, biologists, biophysicists, biochemists, and biotechnologists believed that the wellbeing of humanity depended upon the moral right of having pragmatic freedom in bioresearch in order to discover the truth, to uphold the truth, to complete the truth, and to pursue the application of the truth. Scientific research issues, and more specifically experimental research activities in the fields of biosciences, biotechnology, and biomedical practices have become the controversial sociopolitical debate that exerts an impact on bioethical analysis. Not everyone is happy with the current state of bioethics and much of the discontent is focused on the questions of methodology. Meilaender (1995: 2) echoed this concern: "From where should bioethics take its direction? From within the practice of medicine itself, or from more general moral norms applied to medicine? Do we need a moral theory to guide our bioethical reflection or can we make our way from case to case, gradually mapping the territory? Are the most common bioethical approaches focused too much on the language of rights, able to offer only a thin and minimal ethics that gives little real wisdom about how to ought to live and die?"

Bioethical debates on human, animal, and plant genetics have been the subject areas in research and development in the past centuries. Historically, each generation of bioscientists, biotechnologists, and biomedical practitioners including physicians have been confronted by critical issues in positioning from cautious approval, to wait-and-see attitudes, and/or complete rejection and condemnation of the progressive paths of bio-techno-scientific efforts. There are several critical issues and debates concerning genetic testing, predictive gene diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, somatic cell gene therapy, germ-line gene intervention, organ transplantation, genetic innovation and engineering, genetic information, embryonic research, cloning humans and animals, and diverting the natural evolutionary path of human species into a new global biohierarchy of the human species.

In viewing the present and future holistic lifestyle of human beings, bio-techno-scientific research will no longer be able to stand apart as an independent form of discipline in inquiring and discovering novel possibilities for a better understanding of the mystery of life. In the past, politicians, biotechnologists, and biopharmaceutical ventures tried to separate bio-technoscientific research from cultural values, ethical beliefs, moral philosophies, and religious faiths. They tried to limit biotechno-scientific research within a closed system of inquiry in laboratories. Most sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, ethicists, and theologists have been left out the picture of bioresearch. Yet never, before now, has bio-techno-scientific experimentation been such an important part of our daily life. Today, as never before, bio-techno-scientific experimental efforts have become the object of morality, ethicality, and legality. We will thus, from the viewpoint of bioethicists, analyze the debates over the tension between freedom of research, on one hand and protection of human rights, on the other. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Biosophical Analysis of Ethics in Pharmaceutical Industry: Opportunities and Challenges
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.