Effective Science Tools Supporting Best Practice Methodologies in Distance Education

By Smith, Lynn M. | Distance Learning, July 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Effective Science Tools Supporting Best Practice Methodologies in Distance Education


Smith, Lynn M., Distance Learning


Best practice pedagogy is becoming more of an important issue as initial implementation technological problems and challenges are solved, and online education becomes a more prevalent method of instruction. Electronic courses have saturated the education markets. The continuum of material contained in these electronic courses varies greatly from well planned, designed, and delivered products to a text-based list of information. As a result, a plethora of best practice recommendations in distance education have been developed by a number of organizations to improve quality of distance courses. The Concord Consortium, a research-based group that investigates online technologies, states the following in their learning model for online teaching: "Asynchronous collaboration, explicit schedules, expert facilitation, inquiry pedagogy, community building, limited enrollment, high quality materials, purposeful virtual spaces and ongoing assessment" (http://www.concord.org/publications/ newsletter/2002winter/e-learning_ model.html, 2002). A large part of the research conducted within the Concord Consortium focuses on the instructional design to promote inquiry and deeper thinking. The techniques utilized to promote the dual goals of inquiry and deeper thinking are visual models, peer collaboration, multiple revisions, scaffolding and ongoing assessment. Other organizations have developed similar best practice lists that mirror the Concord model (Chickering & Gamson, 1999; Palloff & Pratt, 2003).

The design of high quality elements that promote higher level thinking in science are where this article will focus. There are, therefore, many questions that face schools when deciding on appropriate and powerful methods to design distance education courses. Is distance education being taught in a manner that allows for students to learn and understand material, or is it presented in a largely text-based format? Does the present format of lesson presentation increase student achievement or are there better methods? Does the presentation of material affect student achievement or dropout rates? Can students understand complex materials via a text-only format? Are there methods for addressing and reducing the incidence of online cheating and plagiarism? So, what do schools look for when deciding to improve or initiate online instruction? The answer focuses in four areas of concern: higher level thinking, assessment, plagiarism or cheating, and a best practice measure that, if implemented, will make a huge positive difference.

Deeper thinking and promotion of student inquiry have been an educational concern for many years. In online courses, it becomes a larger concern since many instructors, struggling with the technology, and simply input large volumes of textual material into their online courses. Further, the level of thinking required from students is often limited. Most online courses according to Jonassen (2002) support "knowledge acquisition and reproductive learning." He expounds on the problem: "First, acquiring knowledge does not lead to or facilitate complex skill or problem solving development. Second and more insidiously, knowledge acquisition assumes an absolutist epistemology in which content is believed to be the truth." Peirce (2003) reiterates this view when he cautions against seeing students as containers to fill with knowledge. Additionally, he promotes the use of higher order thinking skills in online environments. Meyer (2002) concurs and goes on to cite the profusion of text-based instruction in distance environments that do not promote higher level thinking or problem-solving.

Watts (2003) calls for the application of quality face-to-face good practice measures in distance education courses. She promotes the expanded use of critical thinking skills and renewed appreciation for diversity and relationships, a backbone standard in science. Watts believes that technology can be the vehicle to bring people and cultures an increased sensitivity toward others. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Effective Science Tools Supporting Best Practice Methodologies in Distance Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.