TURKEY: Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership?/The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?

By Gunter, Michael M. | The Middle East Journal, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview

TURKEY: Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership?/The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?


Gunter, Michael M., The Middle East Journal


Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership? by Harun Arikan. Aldershot, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2003. xiii + 222 pages. Table. Bibl. to p. 236. Index to p. 256. $99.

The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone? ed. by Michael Lake. London, UK: Federal Trust for Education and Research, 2005. 180 pages. $72.50 cloth; $29.95 paper.

Reviewed by Michael M. Gunter

Whether or not Turkey joins the European Union (EU) promises to be one of the most significant questions of contemporary international politics. Turkish EU membership would put the lie to the clash of civilizations thesis by offering the Muslim world an attractive moderate model of prosperity and cooperation with the West, help solve Turkey's longstanding Kurdish problem, and give the EU better access to the gas and oil supplies of the Middle East, among numerous other possible advantages. On the other hand, Turkey's EU skeptics argue that Turkey's population is too poor, too large, and too Muslim for the EU. These two studies do an excellent job of analyzing why Turkey eventually should be admitted into the EU, but point out the many problems along the way.

Harun Arikan argues repeatedly that Turkey has been treated differently from other EU applicants such as the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs). He terms this alternative policy for Turkey a "containment strategy, designed to delay indefinitely the prospect of membership while anchoring Turkey in the European structure through ... close relations" (p. 2). The author specifically illustrates this containment policy with examples involving human rights, the Kurdish problem and minority issues, economic strategies and developments such as the EU-Turkish Customs Union that went into effect in 1996, Greek-Turkish relations, and security aspects. He argues, for example, that the popular belief that Turkey's political and human rights problems warrant its different treatment, "in fact ... cannot explain why similar political issues in the CEECs [dealing with the Gypsies in Romania and Russian-speakers in Estonia and Latvia] have attracted an entirely different response on the part of the EU" (p. 111). (One might ask, however, whether these minority problems in the CEECs are really comparable to the much larger Kurdish problem in Turkey.)

Nevertheless, Arikan concludes that as a result of treating Turkey differently from other applicants, "the EU has been less effective than it should have been in influencing the development of Turkey's internal policy and also in influencing the settlement of the disagreements between Greece and Turkey" (p. 250). Treating Turkey equally would have been more effective in solving the many outstanding problems because the real promise of EU membership would have given Turkey a greater incentive to reform. "This may explain why democratization efforts have been more successful in these candidate countries than in Turkey" (p. 246). Arikan also maintains that once Turkey finally was offered a specific date for accession talks to begin, much greater progress on all the outstanding issues occurred. "The decisive factor behind these developments has been the prospect of Turkey's EU membership, which was not previously on offer" (p. 247).

Even the accession talks that finally began on October 3, 2005, however, do not imply that the EU has offered a firm membership commitment because these talks are "open-ended ... outcomes of which cannot be guaranteed before hand" (p. 252). Thus, in effect, the EU's containment policy continues and "generate[s] some doubts about what kind of membership the EU would offer for Turkey at the end" (p. 238).

The detailed examples Arikan gives of the EU's unique enlargement policy toward Turkey are for the most part persuasive and demand close consideration. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

TURKEY: Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership?/The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Millstone?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.