Where Criticism Is Still an Art

By Stove, R. J. | The American Conservative, June 18, 2007 | Go to article overview

Where Criticism Is Still an Art


Stove, R. J., The American Conservative


Where Criticism is Still an Art [Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts, edited by Roger Kimball and Hilton Kramer, Ivan R. Dee, 512 pages]

By R.J. Stove

THIS BOOK TEMPTS a reviewer to turn his entire critique into a disclosure of interests. It also forces him to slough his squeamishness about first-person usage, a device Orwell correctly compared to "dosing yourself with some stimulating but very deleterious and very habitforming drug." The New Criterion has printed articles of mine in the past and wUl, I hope, do so again. Obviously I am not going to endanger this working relationship by comprehensively trashing the magazine's hardcover spin-off. Yet an exhibition of toadying would be even duller to read than to write. (It is fit, though, to cite here a friend of Max Beerbohm's, who allegedly said, "I like flattery, so long as it is sufficiently fulsome." Beerbohm's devastating rejoinder: "I impose no conditions at aU.") At best, a reviewer can merely combine candor about his background with detachment about the work under discussion. He should assess its merits and defects as if aU New Criterion staffers were strangers to him. Amiable strangers, he trusts, but strangers nonetheless.

Honesty obliges the admission that during my youth I generaUy avoided the magazine. Back then, I judged publications by a simple yardstick. If they ran material like RJ. O'Rourke's "How to Drive Fast On Drugs And Not SpUl Your Drink," I applauded them; if not, not. Since The New Criterion did not, I had little time for it. Eventually, mirabile dictu, one puts away childish things (unless one is O'Rourke himself, who on his own admission "bought more expensive childish things"). In my case, two gruesome family tragedies blew apart what would otherwise have collapsed more slowly: that is, the entire hovel of semi-literate, consequence-free, protracted-pubescent heathenism in which I had previously dwelt. What had once seemed tedious and hectoring suddenly seemed urgently readable, including The New Criterion's best articles. (The periodical also began championing plulosopher-essayist David Stove; at times I stiU fear that my own New Criterion appearances have derived purely from being David Stove's son.)

Subsequent exposure to Waugh, BeUoc, CS. Lewis, Arnold Lunn, Fulton Sheen, Joseph Sobran, and RusseU Kirk - Kirk, in particular, left much the same impact on my thinking that a dozen jalapeños would leave on the roof of one's mouth - confirmed that when it came to my erstwhUe atheist home, "you can't go home again." From these authors above all, I learned that the West's chief dividing Une, far from being Right versus Left, was that of Christendom versus barbarism. A single cautionary sentence of Waugh annihilated the whole good pagan alibi: "It is no longer possible, as it was in the time of Gibbon, to accept the benefits of civilization and at the same time deny the supernatural basis on which it rests." The present book's introduction acknowledges another Waugh aphorism: "Unstinting effort is needed to keep men living together at peace; there is only a margin of energy left over for experiment however beneficent." Kirk could have said the same things.

As it happens, Counterpoints includes an exceptionaUy disappointing interpretation of Kirk by David Frum, and woe to any reader whose first exposure to Kirk (or to The New Criterion) derives from this source. While the essay does not altogether lack insight, its dismissal of Kirk's Conservative Mind proves simply bizarre. "History, "Frum grandly proclaims, "is the one thing The Conservative Mind is not ... [it] isn't history; it is a work of literature meant to achieve political ends." Anyone who believes that Kirk wrote The Conservative Mind as an exercise in GOP instrumentaUsm, or that its original readers in their tens of thousands bought the book as such, wUl, in the Duke of Wellington's words, beUeve anything. In Frum's eyes, Kirk's main fault would appear to consist of not being Frum. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Where Criticism Is Still an Art
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.