Attitudes concerning Euthanasia: Australia at the Turn of the 21st Century

By Sikora, Joanna; Lewins, Frank | Health Sociology Review, April 1, 2007 | Go to article overview

Attitudes concerning Euthanasia: Australia at the Turn of the 21st Century


Sikora, Joanna, Lewins, Frank, Health Sociology Review


Introduction

The recent bitter and anguished debate over the fate of Terry Schiavo, the US woman who spent years in a coma, is but one example of the consternation surrounding the issue of euthanasia. Such debates raise the question of whether death should be a choice and, if so, for whom and under what circumstances? Even before the Schiavo debate, life prolonging technologies, substantial increases in average life expectancy and activists' efforts have gradually made more transparent, public, and legitimate, a practice which had previously been less visible (Riley 1983:192-193). Some recent examples include Lesley Martin's admission of the 'mercy killing' of her terminally ill mother in New Zealand, the suicide of Australia's Nancy Crick (committed in the belief she had cancer, see Daily Telegraph 2004; Paget 2004) and the pro-choice campaign of the Australian euthanasia activist, Dr Phillip Nitschke, who publicises the 'Peaceful Pill' (King 2004).

Euthanasia: Conceptual complexities

The complex nature of situations in which acts of euthanasia occur necessitates an analytical approach involving varying degrees of human agency and intent. Therefore, we compare and contrast moral evaluations of active, passive as well as voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia, which reflect the different levels of a patient's agency or autonomy (Lewins 1996:113-114).

In common discourse, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is often reduced to a difference between 'killing' and 'letting die'. Voluntary euthanasia is a consensual act of an individual, in full awareness of the nature and likely consequences of their action. Although voluntary euthanasia is not always considered synonymous with assisted suicide (Dworkin et al. 1998), we treat these two concepts as equivalent for the purpose of this analysis, due to the nature of our data. Involuntary euthanasia refers to situations when life is ended against the person's will which are outside the scope of this article. However, we describe attitudes concerning nonvoluntary euthanasia, which may be considered in cases involving newborn babies with serious medical conditions, individuals experiencing severe dementia or senility, and unconscious patients. It is this type of situation, where it is debatable whether the wishes of the person are known or knowable, that is most likely to present significant ethical problems.

Differences in perceived proscriptions from acts of euthanasia and the tension between supporters and opponents of the decriminalisation of voluntary euthanasia have spawned an extensive literature in moral philosophy, law, bioethics and sociology. Most of this literature belongs in applied ethics; only a small part addresses public opinion, which calls for an explanation of the purpose and value of attitudinal studies in this area.

Policy and public opinion concerning euthanasia

Studies stemming from democratic theory consistently find that public opinion is salient in policy development in Western industrialised countries (Brooks and Manza 2006; Burstein 1998, 2003, 2006). The public, however, is more likely to form meaningful opinions about some issues than others, and thus the influence of attitudes varies in particular areas of policy. Attitudinal studies concerning euthanasia, which is an issue usually somewhat marginalised in the political discourse, lead to a better understanding of the social contexts in which euthanasia may become politically salient. The contrast between the dynamics of public opinion and actual policy implementation is likely to reveal the extent to which the regulation of the social practice involving end-of-life decisions reflects attitudinal changes (Burstein 2003). Identifying the structure and trends in attitudes to euthanasia, which we undertake in this article, is a preliminary step in this process. Our account extends and complements earlier survey-based analyses of public perceptions regarding euthanasia in Australia (Kuhse 1995; Hassan 1996; Kuhse et al. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Attitudes concerning Euthanasia: Australia at the Turn of the 21st Century
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.