Film & Literature: Parameters of a Discipline

By Self, Robert T | Literature/Film Quarterly, January 1, 1987 | Go to article overview

Film & Literature: Parameters of a Discipline

Self, Robert T, Literature/Film Quarterly

The imprimateur of English departments upon contemporary teaching and research in film is a function both of the many film scholars who serve on English faculties and teach in the English curriculum and of the literary features of central concerns in film study. Eleven years ago in his important essay "Literature and Film: Marking Out Some Boundaries" Harold Schneider wrote that, "insofar as language departments teach courses in the Art of Film, in Filmmaking, and in the History of Film, I believe they have wandered into alien fields, those best left to Speech and Drama, Film and TV, and Art Departments."1 A lot has changed since then. Some 139 departments of English taught film courses according to the 1973 American Film Institute's Guide to College Courses in Film and Television; a decade later the AFI Guide set that number at close to 200 - more than a 40 percent increase. Throughout the 1970s graduate programs in film began to graduate a significant number of doctoral students, many of whom found jobs in English departments. At the same time, many young literary scholars turned to film study as a natural extension of their research in literature. Many of this young generation of scholars have established research programs that are not only making the study of literature and film an increasingly sound and respectable discipline; their published research has given us a bibliography of secondary sources greatly expanded beyond the classic studies of George Bluestone and Robert Richardson.

Theory and practice in literature and film as a field have significantly developed and matured in the last decade. The context of scholarship which shapes the parameters of literature/film study is the current debate over the nature of texts, the nature of meaning, and the goals of interpretation. As an emergent academic field of research and teaching, defensive about its place in the curriculum, literature and film has shared in that "crisis of criticism" which "has forced critics of all persuasions to make explicit the philosophical postulates that ground their activity - to be self-conscious about what they are doing."2 This self-consciousness urges many perspectives: rhetorical and ideological, sociological and historical, formalist and aesthetic, psychoanalytical, phenomenological, structural, semiological. Certainly many of the major issues in film study are literary issues as well - point of view and the nature of identification with a fictional character or theme, the aspects of classical and modernist narrative structures, close textual analysis and reader-responsiveness, critical interpretation of the meanings of fiction or the deconstructi ve impossibilities of interpretation . Literature/ film teaching and scholarship encompass the literary modes of signification; the articulation systems and styles of fictional, poetic, and dramatic representation; the narrative structures of representation, the sociological rituals of literary discourse, and the mutually influential interaction between films and literature in adaptations.

When I first began teaching, as an English teaching assistant at the University of North Carolina in 1965, film was already accorded parity as a fourth literary genre in the freshman literature course along with drama, poetry, and fiction. This approach is similarly the basis of several introductory literary textbooks: Literature: The Human Experience by Abcarian and Klotz (St. Martin's, 1980, Elements of Literature by Scholes, Klaus, and Silverman (Oxford, 1982), An Introduction to Literature by Barnet, Berman, and Burto (Little Brown, 1977), and To Read Literature by Donald Hall (Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1981). The variety of texts developed to aid students in the writing of essays about literature further reflect the extent to which literature and film have become professionally and pedagogically linked: Sylvan Barnet 's A Short Guide to Writing about Literature (Little, Brown, 1979), Margaret Bryan's and Boyd Davis's Writing about Literature and Film (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1975), and Edgar Roberts's Writing Themes about Literature (Prentice-Hall, 1977) all include major sections on film. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Film & Literature: Parameters of a Discipline


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.