Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle

By Kumar, Sapna; Rai, Arti | Texas Law Review, June 2007 | Go to article overview

Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle


Kumar, Sapna, Rai, Arti, Texas Law Review


Synthetic biology takes as its mission the construction, and "reconstruction," of life at the genetic level.1 The scale and ambition of synthetic biology efforts go well beyond traditional recombinant DNA technology. Rather than simply transferring a preexisting gene from one species to another, synthetic biologists aim to make biology a true engineering discipline.2 In the same way that electrical engineers rely on standard circuit components, or computer programmers rely on reusing modular blocks of code, synthetic biologists wish to create an array of standard, modular3 gene "switches" or "parts" that can be readily synthesized and mixed together in different combinations.4 The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has a "Registry of Standard Biological Parts [that] supports this goal by recording and indexing biological parts that are currently being built and offering synthesis and assembly services to construct new parts, devices, and systems."5 Systems, devices, parts, and DNA represent descending levels of complexity - systems consist of devices, and devices consist of parts composed of DNA.6

The idea behind the Registry of Standard Biological Parts (Registry) is that these parts can, and should, be recombined in different ways to produce many different types of devices and systems.7 Although the Registry currently contains physical DNA, its developers believe that, as DNA synthesis technology becomes capable of generating ever-longer sequences, the Registry will be composed largely of information and specifications that can readily be fabricated in DNA synthesizers.8 The fabricated, DNA-based functions would then be "executed" in a cell.

Synthetic biology's long-term goals encompass such far-reaching possibilities as constructing an entirely artificial programmable genome from standard parts. Scientists in the closely allied field of synthetic chemistry are working on artificial RNA and proteins with added amino acids, presumably linked through an artificial genetic code.9 More immediately, synthetic biology "systems" - that is, organisms engineered with artificial metabolic pathways composed of a number of different standard parts - have produced important concrete results, including the possibility of unlimited supplies of previously expensive drugs for malaria.10 Proponents hope to use synthetic organisms for economical production of not only medically relevant chemicals but also a large variety of industrial materials.11 The possibility of lowcost production of "green" fuels such as cellulosic ethanol has particularly caught the attention of prominent venture capitalists.12 Even more apparently whimsical applications, such as programming bacteria to take photographs13 or to form visible patterns14 may be useful for detection of environmental pollutants. Similarly, programming cells to implement digital logic could have large numbers of medical and computational applications.15

At the same time, synthetic biology has engendered numerous policy concerns. From its inception, commentators have raised issues ranging from bioethical and environmental worries to fears of bioterrorism. The successful in vitro creation of a complete polio virus genome "using mail-order segments of DNA and a viral genome map that is freely available on the Internet" provided a focal point for these concerns.16 The worry has been sufficiently great that the synthetic biology community recently released a declaration publicly committing itself to improving the software that checks DNA synthesis orders for sequences encoding hazardous biological systems.17

There is, however, one area that has been largely unexplored by legal scholars until this point - the relationship of synthetic biology to intellectual property law. Nonetheless, scientists working in this area are sufficiently concerned about the possible impact of intellectual property that they are actively thinking about the applicability of "open source"-type strategies to parts and devices. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.