Can Washington Make Medical Records Private Again?

By Pretzer, Michael | Medical Economics, August 11, 1997 | Go to article overview

Can Washington Make Medical Records Private Again?

Pretzer, Michael, Medical Economics

The electronic age has pretty much destroyed the confidentiality of health information. Can Congress ride to the rescue? And where do physicians come in?

you're not paranoid if you worry that electronically accessible medical data can be collected and used against you. And you don't have to be a wacko cons iracy theorist to suspect that managed-care companies, insurance carriers, employers, and just-for-the-heck-of-it computer sleuths are sifting through your supposedly confidential medical files. That they're checking on physicians and patients alike. That they don't have your best interests at heart. And that there isn't much you-or the law-can do to stop them.

"The simple truth is that health information has little meaningful legal protection today," says Rep. Gary A. Condit, D-Calif.

A person's medical record, 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes griped in his magazine, is less protected than his or her list of video rentals.

Going one further, a USA Today editorialist lamented, "You may as well hire a healthcare skywriter to transcribe your medical history."

Not everyone sees the situation as dire, of course. Some people even argue that electronic records can be made less accessible than paper files. And abuse of electronic medical information is still fairly uncommon, according to Edward Krill, a Washington, D.C., attorney specializing in health care.

Nevertheless, the computerization of medical records is giving people the jitters. Perhaps the data can be used to pressure physicians, against their better judgment, to treat patients the insurance company's way. Or it might provide fodder for the termination of a doctor's HMO contract. Whatever the purpose, tapping into a medical file without authorization breaches the sacrosanct doctor-ntient relationship, argues Gary Dennis, the president of the Medical Society of the District of Columbia.

Will Washington step in to remedy the situation? "It would be wonderful if we could restore the old notion that what you tell your doctor in confidence remains totally secret," says Condit. "But in a health-care environment characterized by third-party payers, medical specialization, high-cost care, and increasing computerization, absolute privacy is simply not possible."

Yet Washington is moving-albeit slowly-to protect the confidentiality of electronic medical records. To get there, it's traveling the usual roads: legislation and regulation.

arly in this session of Congress, Condit introduced the Fair Health Information Practices Act. The bill, referred to simply as HR 52, would require that a collector or holder of patient-identifiable medical records:

Minimize the disclosure of information. Use the information only in ways that are compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.

Disclose it only for authorized purposes.

Under HR 52, when a medical record is used in conjunction with treatment, payment, or oversight, a patient would have the right to:

Inspect or obtain a copy of the information.

Have inaccurate information corrected.

Receive an explanation for the use of the information.

The bill also would establish criminal penalties-up to 10 years imprisonmentand civil sanctions for those who violate its protective provisions. In addition,

HR 52 would allow for alternate dispute resolutions.

"My legislation is not a pie-in-the-sky privacy code," says Condit. "We cannot elevate each patient's privacy interest above every other societal interest. That would be impractical, unrealistic, and expensive. The right answer is to strike an appropriate balance that protects patients' interests while permitting essential uses of data under controlled conditions."

In the debate over HR 52 and similar bills, the word "balance" is often used. Opponents and proponents alike are fond of it. Take, for instance, the congressional testimony of Sherine E. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Can Washington Make Medical Records Private Again?


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.