Social Support for Stress Prevention in Hospital Settings

By Park, Kyoung-Ok | The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, November 2007 | Go to article overview

Social Support for Stress Prevention in Hospital Settings


Park, Kyoung-Ok, The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health


Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of social support, interacting with work stressors, on psychological stress prevention in a public hospital, based on Karasek's demand-control-support (DCS) model.

Methods: A self-administered survey was conducted with 240 employees of a public hospital in the south-east of the United States. The survey asked for demographic information, details on job demands and job control as work stressors, social support, and depressive symptoms as the representative psychological stress symptoms.

Results: Social support was detected as a primary interpersonal positive factor buffering depressive symptoms. Social support was also related to job control and depressive symptoms in the simple correlation. Only the main effect model with general characteristics was significantly accepted in hierarchical regression analysis (p=.04).

High social support was associated with low depressive symptom scores, which means that social support had a positive association with health care employees' mental well being. However, any two-way or three-way interaction model was not accepted. The main effect part of the demand-control-support model was supported; however, interactions between demands, control, and support failed to be supported.

Key words

social support; depressive symptom; psychological stress; demand-control-support model

INTRODUCTION

Stress prevention is a primary research topic from a community health promotion perspective, in particular, depression as the representative stress symptom in a core issue of mental well-being. The annual cost of work stress to U.S. businesses, for example, is thought to be more than $100 billion per annum even as a very conservative estimation.1 The primary reason for the estimated cost of psychological stress at work is not only the increased medical cost of high levels of stress, but also organizational productivity loss.2

Depression, a major psychological stress indicator, was alone estimated to cost $44 billion annually due to its deleterious effects on absenteeism, job performance, and other work behaviours.3,4 Other factors stemming from work stress and adding tremendously to the costs include medical expenditures related to disease, accidents, and suicide. Depression is comprehensively associated with multi-level psychological symptoms from simple discomfort and fatigue to burn-out, and also related to workforce financial loss, because depression has higher rates of short-term disability and relapse than any other common medical condition.5 Kessler and his colleagues in a nationwide study reported that depressed workers had between 1.5 and 3.2 more short-term disability days per month than those without depression.4 The disability days for depression were greater than the disability days for heart disease, lower back pain or diabetes mellitus.6

The demand-control-support model (DCS) is one of the most frequently used work stress models. The DCS model explains the major drivers of work stress and how they affect mental and physical wellbeing in the simple job content framework.7 Karasek operationalized job demands (how much my company requires me to manage at work) and job control (how much I can control the workload) as two major constructs arousing workers' psychological stress.8 Social support has been typically operationalized through individual's perceptions of the amount of supervisor and/or co-worker support to finish their job. The highest level of psychological stress would be expected in the 'high strain, isolated' group suffering from high demands, low control, and low support.2,9

The effects of social support at work on depressive symptoms tend to be stronger and more diverse than job demands or job control based on the other worksite health promotion models, and empirical research findings of worksite mental wellbeing. NIOSH model10 and House's framework of occupational stress employed social support11 as a main and moderating variable, affecting Stressors as well as stress outcomes at worksite. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Social Support for Stress Prevention in Hospital Settings
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.