Report of the Natural Gas Regulation Committee1

Energy Law Journal, July 1, 2007 | Go to article overview

Report of the Natural Gas Regulation Committee1


This report summarizes decisions and policy developments that have occurred in the area of natural gas regulation. The time frame covered by this report is July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007.

I. Oversight and Enforcement

A. Gas Standards of Conduct

1. The D.C. Circuit Vacates and Remands Order 2004 in National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. FERC.

Following the issuance of expanded Standards of Conduct for affiliates of natural gas and electric power transmission providers in Order No. 2004,2 natural gas pipelines and local distribution companies (LDCs) filed petitions for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In November 2006, the Court issued its decision in National Fuel3 The Court vacated and remanded Order No. 2004 as it applied to natural gas pipelines. Gas pipeline interests had challenged the rule broadly, particularly the extension of the Standards of Conduct to energy affiliates in addition to marketing affiliates.4 No electric industry petitioners had challenged die rules, and thus the Standards of Conduct for electric transmission providers were not vacated.

The Court reviewed the background to the Standards of Conduct,5 including the earlier standards established by Order No. 497 in 1988,6 and affirmed by its decision in Tenneco? According to the Court, Order No. 2004 made two fundamental changes from the Standards of Conduct applied under Order No. 497. First, the Court noted that the new Standards of Conduct expanded to govern not only pipeline marketing affiliates but "also pipelines' relationships with numerous non-marketing affiliates-processors, gatherers, producers, local distribution companies, and traders."8 Second, the Court stated that the revised Standards of Conduct would govern "a pipeline's relationships even with those affiliates that do not hold or control any capacity on the pipeline . . . [f]or example, a pipeline is subject to the Standards in its relationship with an affiliated producer that transports gas only on other pipelines."9 The Court then discussed in some detail the vigorous dissents filed by two Commissioners, emphasizing then-Commissioner Kelliher's dissenting contention that '"the flaw in the Standards of Conduct Final Rule is the lack of record evidence to support expanding the scope beyond Marketing Affiliates,'" which led to the Commissioner's conclusion that '"suspicion is not a sufficient basis for expanding the scope of Standards of Conduct beyond Marketing Affiliates.'"10 In addition, the Court noted Commissioner Kelliher's contention that evidence of abuse related to marketing affiliates failed to justify expansion of the Standards of Conduct to include nonmarketing affiliates, and his concern that the effect would be to reduce efficiency without preventing unduly discriminatory behavior. The Court further noted Commissioner Browned's partial dissent regarding the absence of sufficient evidence to support extending the Standards of Conduct to previously exempt affiliated producers, gatherers and processors.11

Citing the agency's obligation to articulate a basis for its rule in light of the record evidence, the Court examined the asserted record basis for the rule. The Court found Order No. 2004 justified on "an asserted theoretical threat of undue preferences and a claimed record of abuse," rather than "solely on the theoretical danger."12 If the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) could not support Order No. 2004 on the "claimed record evidence,"13 the Court would not uphold it. As in Tenneco, the Court noted the consumer efficiencies arising from vertical integration, and further described Tenneco as standing "for the proposition that FERC cannot impede vertical integration between a pipeline and its affiliates without 'adequate justification.'"14 The Court largely affirmed Order No. 497 because it found that the FERC had properly re lied upon both evidence of "(i) a plausible theoretical threat[s] of anticompetitive information-sharing between pipelines and their marketing affiliates and (ii) vast record evidence of abuse. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Report of the Natural Gas Regulation Committee1
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.