Global Income Inequality

By Milanovic, Branko | Soundings, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Global Income Inequality

Milanovic, Branko, Soundings

Branko Milanovic looks at changing patterns of global inequality, and different ways of measuring it.

What do we mean by global inequality? How large is it? Is it increasing? Why does it matter? What can be done about it? These are some questions addressed here.

The three ways to look at global inequality

There are three main concepts of global inequality that need to be clearly distinguished, but are often confounded: inequality among countries' per capita incomes - either unweighted (Concept 1) or weighted by countries' populations (Concept 2) - and inequality between world individuals (Concept 3).

Concept 1 deals with convergence and divergence of countries' average incomes, but not with income inequality among all people in the world. Economic growth in a small country will not have the same effect on global welfare as growth in a populous country. Concept 2 takes this into account by weighing each country by its population. However, this implicitly assumes that each individual within a country receives the per capita income of that country. Thus, it does not take into account within-country inequalities. Only Concept 3 includes inequalities both between and within countries.

The reason why Concepts 1 and 2 (the latter often used as a proxy for 'true' inequality between world individuals) have been calculated more frequently is simply that the data requirements are much less onerous. To calculate Concepts 1 or 2 we need to have data only for per capita incomes (often GDP per capita) and population. Thus annual calculations of Concept 1 and Concept 2 inequality across most countries in the world are relatively simple matters. For Concept 3, however, we need to have information on national income distributions. We also need, of course, to convert all the incomes expressed in local currencies into a common yardstick generally represented by international (PPP) dollars. National income distribution figures are obtainable only from household surveys, and surveys often differ in their design, definition, coverage, etc - between years for the same country, even more so between countries - and are not available for all countries annually. In addition, national income distribution data for China, USSR, and most of Africa were unavailable until the mid-1980s. This is the reason why the first detailed and relatively comprehensive (representing more than 90 per cent of the world population) Concept 3 calculations could be done only for the period after around 1985. This is also the reason why such a calculation cannot be executed annually, but only for more or less evenly spaced four or five year intervals.

But once we have these methodological issues straightened out, we enter into what is popularly called 'the tyranny of numbers'. As Figure 1 shows, the evolutions of Concept 1 and Concept 2 inequality have, particularly over the last quarter a century, taken different paths. (All three concepts are measured using the Gini coefficient, a standard measure of inequality that ranges from the theoretical value of 0 - everybody has the same income - to the equally theoretical value of 100 - all income is appropriated by one country or one person.) Since the late 1970s, Concept 1 inequality has been on the rise, and this has finally slowed down only in the last couple of years. The reasons are clear: stagnation and decline of middle-income countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe and the former USSR, and almost relentless declines of mean incomes in most of Africa. At the same time, Western countries have notched up respectable growth rates, just over 2 per cent per capita annually. Consequently, while middle and bottom countries have deteriorated in relative, and often absolute, terms, the top has grown richer. But exactly the opposite evolution is charted by Concept 2 inequality. China and India, since around 1978 and the mid-1990s respectively, have dramatically increased their growth rates; but whereas in Concept 1 calculations they do not count for more than any other two countries, in Concept 2 calculations they account for almost 40 per cent of world population. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Global Income Inequality


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.