Is Behaviorism Becoming a Pseudoscience? Replies to Drs. Wyatt, Midkiff and Wong

By Wakefield, Jerome C. | Behavior and Social Issues, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview

Is Behaviorism Becoming a Pseudoscience? Replies to Drs. Wyatt, Midkiff and Wong


Wakefield, Jerome C., Behavior and Social Issues


ABSTRACT:

Wyatt and Midkiff (2006a) and Wong (2006a) argued that the eclipse of token economy treatment for schizophrenia was due not to scientific judgments but to the biological politics of the mental health field. I argued that the treatment's fate was due to its own limitations, particularly the failure of effects to generalize adequately to natural environments given deinstitutionalization (Wakefield, 2006). Wyatt and Midkiff (2006b) and Wong (2006b) vigorously disputed my claim. In this reply, I analyze their responses regarding generalization, and their arguments for behavioral etiology. I conclude that we all agree that such treatments were not shown to adequately generalize, providing a scientific reason for the treatment's fate. I also find their etiological arguments unsound. Even-handed attention to evidence, recognition of behaviorism's limits and strengths, and an integrative approach are essential if behaviorism is not to veer toward pseudoscience.

KEYWORDS: behaviorism, behavioral treatment, schizophrenia, token economy, etiology of schizophrenia, mental disorder, history of psychology, history of psychiatry, philosophy of science, harmful dysfunction, biological causation, pharmaceutical industry, psychotropic medications

In an earlier issue of this journal, I published a commentary (Wakefield, 2006) on Dr. Wong's (2006a) and Drs. Wyatt and Midkiff s (2006a) target articles in which they critiqued the turn toward biological approaches and away from behavioral approaches to severe mental disorder. My commentary elicited vigorous, quite harsh responses (Wong, 2006b; Wyatt & Midkiff, 2006b). The Editor having generously allowed me to reply, I hope to advance the discussion by clarifying the arguments behind the heated rhetoric.

First, some general comments might help orient the discussion. In their target articles, both Wyatt and Midkiff and Wong attempt to resuscitate behavioral intervention for severe mental disorders by attacking biological psychiatry and blaming behaviorism's waning fortunes on the politics of the mental health field rather than on any scientific findings about behavioral intervention: "The decline of behavioral approaches in the treatment of psychoses is a minor mystery in the history of science, and I have suggested tiiat an understanding of this seeming dead end requires that one look beyond the activities of behavioral researchers to larger ideological, political, and economic movements..." (Wong, 2006a, p. 169). And the conclusion, as expressed by Wyatt and Midkiff (2006a), was that "it is time for a paradigm shift, away from extreme biological causation and toward an environmental causation model..." (p. 147). In other words, the fault lies not in behaviorism itself, but in its political stars.

I pointed out that the authors' claim that the waning of behavioral intervention was due to politics, not scientific considerations, needed to be assessed as a causal hypothesis, and this entailed assessing the scientific pros and cons of behavioral intervention: "Such a claim must be supported not merely by showing that biological psychiatry has weaknesses-so does every theory!-but by showing also that behavioral approaches do not have equal or greater weaknesses" (Wakefield, 2006, p. 203). I also noted that political processes always accompany scientific change; the question is whether there was an underlying scientific logic that allowed those forces to hold sway, and whether political processes replaced or merely accompanied a reasonably legitimate scientific judgment. For example, the switch at many psychiatric institutions from predominantly psychoanalytic to predominantly biological research often involved intense politics, but was grounded in legitimate scientific considerations.

The potential pseudoscientific status of the audiors' "politics" claim should be clear. When Freudians blamed rejection of the oedipal theory on the defensiveness of opposing dieoreticians, that was dismissed as pseudoscientific avoidance of evidence. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Behaviorism Becoming a Pseudoscience? Replies to Drs. Wyatt, Midkiff and Wong
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.