Voting Rights Distortions

By Rubin, Jennifer | The American Spectator, February 2008 | Go to article overview

Voting Rights Distortions


Rubin, Jennifer, The American Spectator


The Justice Department's Voting Rights section is full of career lawyers pushing abusive policies. Why is the Bush administration offering no resistance?

Bush Appointees Politicize Justice Department." That's the generic headline we've seen hundreds of times, shoehorned into one situation after another. The Bush administration stands accused of the mortal sin of "politicizing the process," of firing federal attorneys who were not sufficiently deferential to its whims, of weeding out top brass who weren't willing to go along with its right-wing, laissez-faire, protorture agenda.

From John Ashcroft to Alberto Gonzales to Michael Mukasey, Bush Justice appointees are cast as ideological crusaders who want to wiretap Sunday school teachers, prosecute magazines for showing women's navels, and set Civil Rights back 40 years. The good guys in this story are the career employees of the Justice Department, who are willing to blow loud whistles and stand their ground in the face of blatant politicization.

The problem with larger media narratives is that, even when they contain some truth, they often stand in the place of serious reporting or analysis. In the slow rollout of the history of the post-9/11 Bush administration, former Attorney General Ashcroft is emerging as a principled defender of Americans going about their business without the government listening in. The picture is contrary to the hundreds of stories at the time that cast him as a scourge of civil liberties and a coverer-up of nude statues.

Likewise, some career employees of the Justice Department are starting to look decidedly less heroic. A great case in point is the staff of the Voting Rights Section (VRS) of the Civil Rights Division. Current and former employees of that department tell a story far different story from the popular media narrative. They talk instead of ideologically corrupt career attorneys pursuing a highly results-oriented agenda and misusing federal power.

They also allege that, far from trying to check the ideological excesses of the VRS, the Bush administration seems resigned to the whims of activists bent on distorting voting rights laws and bullying local.

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION has been routinely castigated by the press and liberal civil rights groups for departing from "fair" and "aggressive enforcement" of civil rights laws. In the 1990s, however, the Voting Rights Section was itself out of control. In seven cases during the tenure of VRS head Joe Rich, a career civil servant, the Department of Justice was fined more than $4 million for bringing frivolous and abusive enforcement actions against local jurisdictions.

In the case of Miller v. Johnson, the department was fined and severely reprimanded for essentially acting at the behest of ACLU and civil rights groups. It helped in devising voting redistricting lines to maximize minority voting power, and then misrepresenting to the courts the extent of that cooperation.

That cooperation should not have been too surprising. The VRS has traditionally been populated by liberal activists, a number of whom have donated to and worked on Democratic campaigns. Many of the section's attorneys move on to work at liberal interest groups or are hired from these organizations. MoveOn.org posters declaring "Regime change begins at home" are openly displayed in the offices of these apolitical staff attorneys.

According to conservative activists, the Bush administration quickly capitulated to the whims of the liberals in Congress and in civil rights organizations. Edward Blum, visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and an expert in voting rights law, explains that from the onset the Bush administration "bought into the entire diversity rationale" and was never committed to the ideals of "colorblind jurisprudence."

For example, even before the Voting Rights Act expired, the Bush administration committed to reauthorizing the statute that gives immense power to the federal government to oversee and approve essentially all voting changes in nine states and other jurisdictions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Voting Rights Distortions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.