Fixing the System

By Kroesen, Frederick J. | Army, December 2007 | Go to article overview

Fixing the System


Kroesen, Frederick J., Army


This article is based on remarks made by Gen. Frederick J. Kroesen, U.S. Army retired, at a conference entitled "The U.S. Citizen-Soldier at War: A Retrospective Look and the Road Ahead," sponsored by the Virginia Military Institute and the Cantigny First Division Foundation, and held at the First Division Museum at Cantigny in Wheaton, Ill., October 12-13, 2007. Cantigny is part of the McCormick Tribune Foundation of Chicago. A full conference report is forthcoming and can be ordered at www.first divisionmuseum.org. A follow-up conference in 2008 or early 2009 is being planned.

One of the brightest gems among the crown jewels of this nation is the U.S. Army. Maintaining it as the world's premier fighting force is an absolute, a fundamental requirement not only for the United States but also for the future of the free world. We aren't always right, but over a couple of hundred years we've been quite successful at accomplishing missions. We don't always win, but that is usually because politically we settled for less.

In the past four years, the Army has been abused, overcommitted, strained and stressed, yet it is still performing magnificently in the field. It has retained its high-quality manpower with previously unheard-of retention rates and has appealed to a sufficient number of new enlistees to satisfy its endstrength requirements, even as that number has increased. Units in combat are still well equipped and, with the usual help from American industry, it has made notable progress in designing equipment to meet new battlefield demands-body armor, armored Humvees, electronic sensors and jammers, the MRAP [mine resistant ambush protected] vehicle-none of which were in the inventory before 9/11.

But the Army has also suffered a deterioration that, in time, cannot help but erode its excellence in the field. The veteran soldiers in grades from E4 to 04 who are serving their third or fourth tours in Iraq or Afghanistan still reflect their job satisfaction-it's what they joined to do-but their family satisfaction is far from assured. Wives (spouses) have revolted, are revolting or soon will revolt against a system that requires soldiers to be gone from home more than 50 percent of the time.

Let me be the first to acknowledge that my view of this situation is not shared by everyone, including some at this conference. For example, some complain that the satisfactory manpower status is only because of lower standards, multimillions in bonus money and the stop-loss policy. My counterargument says the quality of the force has not changed measurably or markedly, that current enlistment and reenlistment standards are in keeping with established limits and that manpower is a commodity for which we have to compete. Moneybonus money or otherwise-is what makes the Army competitive in the manpower market. In my view, we still are not paying enough. We have a play-off team on the field that must not lose, and we ought to be paying playoff wages. The bonuses for enlistment and reenlistment leave a gap, that is, payment for those doing the heavy lifting in the combat arena, which would make the reward worth the risk. The attrition of experienced soldiers is too high. For example, the West Point graduating class of 2001 lost more than 50 percent of its members when their minimum service obligations were met. I would like to tell every soldier that when he boards a ship or plane for the combat zone his pay will double, triple if he is in the combat force carrying the fight to the enemy, until his return-and I believe that kind of reward would reduce the bonus money needed for recruiting and retention.

The recent congressional hearings concerning the Blackwater company I found quite relevant. The Blackwater spokesman revealed that he received more than a million dollars for his year in Iraq, a princely sum when compared to the salary of Gen. Petraeus. But the most significant factor to me is that Blackwater and all the other contract organizations in Iraq and Afghanistan do not have manpower shortages because they are paying a reward that their employees recognize as worth the risk. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fixing the System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.