A Review of the Adult Reading Assessment and Instruction Research

By Kruidenier, John R. | Perspectives on Language and Literacy, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview

A Review of the Adult Reading Assessment and Instruction Research


Kruidenier, John R., Perspectives on Language and Literacy


The National Institute for Literacy (the "Institute"), in collaboration with the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, established the Adult Literacy Research Working Group to identify research-based practices for reading instruction and to disseminate information about these practices to those who provide reading instruction in adult education programs. This action is part of a larger effort by the federal government, beginning in the 1990s and continuing through the current administration, to build professional education cultures that value and use evidence-based principles for reading instruction with children, adolescents, and adults.

Reviewing adult reading instruction research is a key function of the Working Group whose other functions are described in detail in the introductory article by John Comings and June Justice Crawford in this issue. The Working Group's summary of results from studies of adult readers and adult reading instruction provides the basic content for its dissemination efforts as well as the basis for its efforts to identify or develop useable and practical research-based resources for adult education professional development. Some of these resources are described in two other articles in this issue: "Relating Reading Research to Practice: Two Resources for Adult Education Teachers" by Susan McShane and "Adult Educators in the United States: Who Are They and What Do They Know About Teaching Reading?" by Mary Ziegler, Steve McCallum, and Sherry Bell.

Although a large body of evidence-based principles exists for reading assessment and instruction of children in kindergarten through high school (K-12), not all of it applies to low-literate adults or adult education settings. For example, adult learners may not be able to devote as much time or be as consistent in their attendance as school children (Comings, Parella, & Soricone, 1999; Comings, Cuban, Bos, & Porter, 2003) making some proven instructional methods unworkable in adult education settings. Likewise, some evidence-based principles developed for adult struggling readers may not benefit children who are learning to read. For example, adults' interests and experiences may contribute to vocabulary and prior knowledge in ways that make adult literacy instructional methods less relevant for use with children. The needs of adults and children, and their teachers, are different: children who are learning to read are from all ability levels; adults who are learning to read may be predominantly those who have experienced difficulty academically because of a learning disability or for other reasons. Somewhat paradoxically, students reading at roughly the same grade level, or within a fairly narrow range, fill an elementary school teacher's classroom at the beginning of the school year. A classroom full of adult literacy students, however, may be filled with learners at just about any reading level, from beginners to those studying for their high school equivalency exam.

Thus, as a starting point for building an evidence-based education culture among adult literacy providers, the Working Group needed to identify and evaluate the existing research specifically related to adult reading instruction and assessment. At the same time, it realized that the relatively small size of the adult reading instruction research base would make it necessary to fill in the gaps with carefully selected studies of children learning to read. This article presents highlights from the Working Group's findings. For the complete findings and related instructional products, see the Working Group's publications (Kruidenier, 2002b; Curtis and Kruidenier, 2005) or visit the Institute's website ( www.nifl.gov/ partnershipforreading/publications/ adult.html). The Working Group is in the process of completing an update to Research-Based Principles for Adult Basic Education Reading Instruction (Kruidenier, 2002b).

Methods

In order to accomplish its goal, the Working Group established a three-step process: 1) select the major topics to review, 2) conduct literature searches to locate studies that fit these topics, and 3) evaluate the studies using a set of evidence-based methodological standards. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Review of the Adult Reading Assessment and Instruction Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.