Security Takeovers and Bailouts: Aviation and the Return of Big Government

By Branum, Tara; Dokupil, Susanna | Texas Review of Law & Politics, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview

Security Takeovers and Bailouts: Aviation and the Return of Big Government


Branum, Tara, Dokupil, Susanna, Texas Review of Law & Politics


The argument against big government is probably less salient today than at any time in decades. People want safe commercial air travel, regardless of the impact on the size of government or the cost. Period.

--Charlie Cook, The National Journal1

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

--Benjamin Franklin2

I. INTRODUCTION

It is now a cliche that the world changed on September 11, 2001. Until then, few Americans believed that the United States would ever again be attacked on its own soil. Most unthinkingly assumed that the country would remain immune from the terrorist attacks that have ransacked other parts of the world. Although the initial shock has worn off, Americans no longer live with the mistaken belief that they are immune from acts of terror.3

Reality has been difficult for the country to absorb. Americans panicked in the weeks following September 11. Overwhelmed and shell-shocked by the enormity of the catastrophes in New York and Washington, D.C., many Americans desperately sought something-anything-to restore their customary feelings of IMAGE FORMULA9

safety and security. Most immediately turned to an entity larger than themselves for help: the federal government.4 The government, unsurprisingly, responded immediately to this popular demand by increasing federal control of any aspect of life even remotely related to national security.5 In the months following the terrorist attacks, a whole host of government programs sprang into place.

For the most part, panicked citizens and businesses clamored for and willingly accepted these government-issued Band-Aids.6 Industries relying upon tourism lined-up for government handouts.7 Concerned citizens encouraged legislators to consider expansions of welfare programs.8 Insurance companies sought relief.9 The victims' families bargained for a compensation package issued by the federal government.10 Of the many industries that have sought government aid, however, IMAGE FORMULA11

the aviation industry was the most successful. Within a few short months of the attacks, the airlines had not only secured a financial bailout package from the federal government,11 but they had also achieved another long-desired measure. After repeatedly refusing to do so in years past, Congress finally passed legislation mandating that much of the security operations at the country's airports be handled by a federal bureaucracy, relieving the airlines both of the cost and responsibility.12

The governmental response to the aviation industry is problematic for several reasons. First, it contravenes the First Principles upon which this country was founded. The Founding Fathers did not envision a country in which every problem would be met with a federal bureaucracy. To the contrary, they feared that a large government would undermine liberty. They recognized that a federal government is necessary to perform certain functions, especially in the area of national defense;13 however, they saw this federal government as a " 'necessary evil' " to be restrained and watched at every step.14 Rather than using "national defense" as an excuse to needlessly enlarge the government in the midst of a crisis, they would have carefully evaluated the need for any particular government measure. Despite the recent panic, twenty-first century Americans should do the same.15 IMAGE FORMULA13

Next, the governmental response to the aviation industry poses practical problems. Even if the response were acceptable from a philosophical perspective, past history shows that solutions relying too heavily on increased governmental assistance are unlikely to help the aviation industry in the long term, although they may assuage short-term pain. A private security force at airports, meeting federally-mandated guidelines, will more successfully combat terrorism than a large, unaccountable bureaucracy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Security Takeovers and Bailouts: Aviation and the Return of Big Government
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.