Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments

By Stras, David R. | Texas Law Review, April 2008 | Go to article overview

Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments


Stras, David R., Texas Law Review


Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments

CONFIRMATION WARS: PRESERVING INDEPENDENT COURTS IN ANGRY TIMES. By Benjamin Wittes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2006. Pp. 168. $22.95.

SUPREME CONFLICT: THE INSIDE STORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. By Jan Crawford Greenburg. New York, NY: The Penguin Press, 2007. Pp. 340. $27.95.

I. Introduction

Amidst greater polarization in American politics, the process for nominating and confirming federal judges has become more political than ever. Nominees to the federal circuit courts are now being confirmed at historically low rates, the delay between nomination and confirmation of all Article III judges is growing longer, and it is not uncommon for lower court nominees to never receive a vote or hearing before the Senate. Legal scholars have written a litany of articles decrying the increasing politicization of the process and proposing reform measures to make the process more orderly and genteel. The solutions in the scholarly literature range from conferring nearly unbridled discretion to the Executive in appointing judges to advocating a more robust role for the Senate's constitutionally granted "Advice and Consent"1 power. Put simply, there is no shortage of proposed solutions to the increasing politicization of the judicial appointments process.

Few scholars, however, have analyzed the reasons behind the growing politicization of the process. In two recent books, Confirmation Wars2 and Supreme Conflict,3 Benjamin Wittes and Jan Crawford Greenburg provide an insider's view of the world of judicial appointments and make a persuasive case that the process for appointing judges has indeed changed over the past thirty years. Both books are essential reading for students of the Supreme Court-Greenburg because of her unprecedented access, which transforms Supreme Conflict into a fascinating narrative, and Wittes because he illuminates some of the most problematic aspects of the increasing politicization of the judicial appointments process.

Neither, however, is able to capture the whole story. In delivering powerful vignettes about the Supreme Court and the controversies surrounding the appointment of eight Justices since 1982, Greenburg fails to consider the broader normative implications of her narrative. For his part, Wittes makes a forceful argument that aggrandizement of the selection of judicial nominees in the Executive Branch has led to greater conflict during the confirmation process and that confirmation hearings have done nothing to improve the Senate's consideration of judicial nominees. But Wittes undermines his own argument by failing to consider any of the benefits flowing from confirmation hearings or to link his proposed reforms to the harms that he identifies from the increasingly political process. Unfortunately, neither Greenburg nor Wittes is able to provide an analytical account of the reasons for the growing politicization of the judicial appointments process.

Part II of this Review Essay discusses Supreme Conflict and Confirmation Wars in detail, including the strengths and weaknesses of both books. Part III begins where both books leave off by identifying the structural, judicial, and external factors that account for growing politicization of the judicial appointments process. Structural factors, such as the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment and the proliferation of confirmation hearings for judicial nominees, have driven the Senate to take a more active role at the confirmation stage. External factors, such as the rise of organized interest groups and the mass media, have exerted pressure on the key players in the process, including senators and the president, to act with a keen eye toward pleasing constituent groups and maintaining a consistent policy image. Finally, the Court's own ventures into contentious areas of social policy-such as school integration, abortion, and homosexual rights-have raised the stakes of confirmation battles even higher. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.