Traditions in Social Science and Victim Policy

By Sales, Bruce; Gottfredson, Michael | Violence and Victims, January 1, 1990 | Go to article overview

Traditions in Social Science and Victim Policy

Sales, Bruce, Gottfredson, Michael, Violence and Victims

In public policy discussions about criminal justice, it has been fashionable recently to refer to victims as the "forgotten part" of the criminal justice system. There have been repeated allegations that the procedural guarantees afforded those accused of crime tip the balance too far in favor of consideration of offenders' rights. Similarly, there have been frequent claims that the victims of crimes have been insufficiently consulted in the preparation of the State's case and during the sentencing phase of the process. The often heard complaint is that the victim is victimized twice - once by the offender and then again by the criminal justice process.

As a result, there has been a flurry of activity in the policy arena focused on crime victims. Examples of this attention are numerous and include such diverse policies as "victim rights" movements (giving the victim increased roles during the pretrial and trial phases and during sentencing), sentencing schemes promoting restitution, calls for harsher punishments for drunk drivers, programs directed at spouse and child abuse prevention and counseling, and consideration of expansion of the excuse for self-defense for homicide to include a "battered spouse defense."

A corresponding increase in attention to victims has been taking place in the social and behavioral sciences. One hallmark of this social scientific attention to victim issues has been its strong international perspective; a second is the effort to enhance the quality of the empirical basis for policy evaluations. As a result, some of the empirical studies done by social scientists during the past decade provide excellent examples of the potentially positive relationship between social scientific research and public policy. During the last decade, for example, some of the largest, most sophisticated social surveys in the United States and in Europe have focused on the victims of crime, seeking to estimate probabilities of victimization and to uncover correlates of violence and theft victimization (Hindelang, 1976; Hindelang, Gottfredson & Garofalo, 1978; Hough & Mayhew, 1983; Gottfredson, 1984; Hough & Mayhew, 1985). Other scholars have probed the attitudes and values of respondents as these relate to victimization experiences (Garofalo, 1979; Maxfield, 1984) and tracked the experiences of victims through the criminal justice process. The concept of domestic victimization has received some of the most extensive empirical work (Sherman & Berk, 1984).

Systematic study of the factors influencing the probability of victimization have helped shape the crime prevention movement widely adopted by European governments and by Canada. The "opportunity" theories advanced by Mayhew and her colleagues in Britain (Mayhew et al., 1976) were assisted by the development of the British Crime Survey (Hough & Mayhew, 1983). These theories focus directly on the features of targets that make them more or less suitable for criminal victimization and have important policy implications (Clarke, 1983). At the same time, the nationally representative probability samples that provide the basis for the National Crime Survey in the United States helped define the victimized segments of the American population and to question nascent policies focusing on such low-rate groups as the elderly. The recent victimization survey undertaken in Switzerland by Killias (1989) examined not only the distribution of victimization in the Swiss population, but the impact of victimization on the victims as well.

Finally, systematic empirical work on restitution to crime victims began almost as soon as restitution became a popular sentencing option, both in the United States and in Britain (Harland, 1982; 1983). This work indicated quite strongly that the unanticipated consequences of restitutionary schemes might overwhelm their positive virtues. Thus, like other financial penalties, problems arise when the policy confronts the reality of the most common criminal offenders who do not have the resources nor perhaps the commitment to meet restitution obligations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Traditions in Social Science and Victim Policy


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.