Returning Arbitration to an Effective Process in CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

By Joyce, William R. | Dispute Resolution Journal, May-July 2008 | Go to article overview

Returning Arbitration to an Effective Process in CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS


Joyce, William R., Dispute Resolution Journal


This article discusses the advantages of arbitration for construction disputes and how to tailor the process to the needs of the parties. It also addresses the recent change in the AIA standard form construction contract making arbitration an election rather than the default process.

In recent years, the arbitration process has been under increased scrutiny in both the local and national press. Lawyers and business commentators alike have expressed divergent views about whether arbitration, in practical terms, is any less expensive or time-consuming than litigation. That debate, however, has often focused on abuses of the arbitration process that make it more like traditional litigation, rather than on any inherent problems in arbitration and, as a result, has overlooked the fact that arbitration can be an efficient way to resolve disputes outside the court system.

Within the construction industry, that debate is particularly relevant. Deciding between arbitration and litigation as the favored dispute resolution process for disputes arising out of construction projects has never been more important because of recent changes in the standard construction contracts published by the American Institute of Architects (AIA). Every 10 years the AIA revises and updates these standard contracts, which are the primary contract documents used across the country on every type of construction project.

In early November 2007, the AIA released the latest revision to its most widely used standard contract document, AIA A201, "General Conditions of the Contract for Construction." Under the 1997 version of A201, boilerplate provisions mandated that when disputes arise, the parties to the contract must participate in the arbitration process. But that is no longer true. Under the new version of A201, the parties must elect to use arbitration by checking the arbitration box. If they don't, they will be opting, by default, for litigation.

For everyone in the construction industry, that's an important change. Many construction participants already know the benefits of arbitration and will elect to arbitrate disputes that cannot be settled in mediation. Others, however, will have to consider their options in order to decide how to deal with the dispute resolution provisions under the new AIA contract documents. In other words, they will have to decide which is the better option-arbitration or litigation. The purpose of this article is to help them make that decision by explaining the advantages of arbitration and how the process can be made to work effectively and efficiently.

Advantages of Arbitration

Greater Efficiency. Construction arbitration proceedings are almost always less time-consuming than litigation. This is because the process allows only limited discovery-usually just an exchange of relevant documents and few if any depositions-while litigation permits extremely wide discovery and lengthy depositions. Without question, the discovery part of the litigation process-which can include lengthy requests for documents and long lists of written questions called interrogatories (which can have multiple subparts)-can cause the time spent litigating (and hourly legal fees) to add up. Other causes of high litigation costs include the time spent questioning witnesses under oath in pretrial depositions.

Another reason why litigation takes much longer than arbitration is that a respondent is allowed 20 days to answer a complaint, and then each side has 30 days to answer each discovery request served. When these time periods are close to running out, the parties' counsel often send out requests to extend these time periods.

Then there is the motion practice associated with litigation. It is normal litigation practice for the attorneys to file every possible motion they can. When a motion is filed, the attorney for the moving party needs to prepare a memorandum of law (also called a legal brief) for the court and this takes a lot of lawyer time. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Returning Arbitration to an Effective Process in CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.