Privacy: State Interest in Regulation of Potentially Harmful Drugs Outweighs Individuals' Right to Privacy of Prescription Records-State V. Russo

By Kochhar, Rajpreet K. | American Journal of Law & Medicine, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

Privacy: State Interest in Regulation of Potentially Harmful Drugs Outweighs Individuals' Right to Privacy of Prescription Records-State V. Russo


Kochhar, Rajpreet K., American Journal of Law & Medicine


Privacy: State Interest in Regulation of Potentially Harmful Drugs Outweighs Individuals' Right to Privacy of Prescription Records-State v. Russo1-The Supreme Court of Connecticut held that a public official responsible for safeguarding public health and safety may validly request prescription information or records in the course of performing his or her official duties.2 Defendant Nicholas Russo, a detective in the Hartford police department, became the subject of an investigation for forgery and obtaining controlled substances by forging prescriptions. Marcus Brown, an investigator working with Russo's supervisor, acquired Russo's prescription records with the pharmacists' permission but without a warrant or Russo's prior consent. Russo moved to suppress the prescription records.3

The trial court granted Russo's motion, finding that as the subject of a criminal investigation, he had "a constitutionally protected privacy interest in those [prescription] records," requiring either a search warrant or Russo's consent.4 The state appealed, claiming that Russo's prescription records were legally acquired with the pharmacists' consent, and that Russo's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated.5

The Connecticut Supreme Court emphasized the plain language of the statute at issue, which specifies that "[p]rescriptions shall be open for inspection only to federal, state, county and municipal officers, whose duty it is to enforce the laws ... relating to controlled substances."6 Focusing on the statute's legislative history and purpose, the court read the relevant section along with other provisions7 to indicate that the "central purpose of the record retention requirement . . . is to ensure that prescriptions will be 'accessible for inspection' by law enforcement officials responsible for enforcing those laws."8 The court concluded that Brown, working in conjunction with the Hartford police, clearly fit into the "law enforcement official" language and subsequently was authorized to obtain Russo's prescription records with only the pharmacists' consent.9

The court held that Russo's Fourth Amendment right to privacy was not violated when Brown obtained Russo's prescription records without a warrant or prior consent.10 Although courts have not clearly defined the boundaries of one's right to privacy, it is "not absolute."11 The court noted that a person could reasonably expect his or her prescription records to remain private because of the medical information contained therein.12 However, the court also stressed that "the reasonableness of a person's expectation that his or her personal or intimate medical information will not be disclosed [is dependant] upon the circumstances underlying the particular disclosure."13 The court concluded that "a legitimate request for prescription information or records by a public official responsible for safeguarding public health and safety is a valid exercise of the state's police powers, and, consequently, does not constitute an impermissible invasion of privacy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Privacy: State Interest in Regulation of Potentially Harmful Drugs Outweighs Individuals' Right to Privacy of Prescription Records-State V. Russo
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.