Reaping the Rich Inheritance of Love: Motherhood in Georgian England

By Short, Edward | The Human Life Review, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

Reaping the Rich Inheritance of Love: Motherhood in Georgian England


Short, Edward, The Human Life Review


In his Life of Johnson, Boswell recalls Johnson arguing with a "pertinacious gentleman," who, after talking "in a very puzzling manner," turned to the old sage and said, "I don't understand you, Sir," whereupon Johnson threw up his hands and replied "Sir, I have found you an argument... I am not obliged to find you an understanding."1

Anyone who has ever endeavored to convince a hardened pro-abortionist of the inviolability of unborn life will know the exasperation Johnson felt. The reasoning necessary to recognize that destroying unborn life is indefensible is not abstruse. Grasping the golden rule is sufficient: We must not do unto others what we would not have others do unto us. When Ronald Reagan said, "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born," he was refuting the case for abortion with the same appeal to common sense that Johnson used to refute Bishop Berkeley's theory of the non-existence of matter, when, kicking a large stone, he declared: "I refute it thus." Yet to many pro-abortionists common sense makes no appeal. For them, the child in the womb, like that stone, is simply unreal.

This refusal to accept the testimony of common sense is characteristic of certain feminist history. In her highly acclaimed book, The Gentleman's Daughter: Women's Lives in Georgian England (1998), Amanda Vickery depicts her upper-class female subjects not as individuals but as noble victims. Thus, the women in her pages are described as resigned to "the symbolic authority of fathers and husbands, the self-sacrifices of motherhood and the burdensome responsibility for domestic servants, house-keeping and family consumption. The fact that these elements were so abiding perhaps accounts for the extent of acquiescence-rebelling against roles that appeared both prehistoric and preordained would profit nothing."2 In other words, if common sense suggests that her subjects became mothers and managed households out of love and a concomitant sense of duty, well, common sense is mistaken. They assumed such roles because they had no choice but to assume them.

Implicit in Vickery's analysis is the contention that if 18th-century women had had their way they would have rebelled against these "prehistoric and preordained" roles. Like their feminist successors, they would have revolted against the authority of fathers and husbands, refused the self-sacrifices of motherhood and let others manage the servants and the household accounts. Vickery's book abounds in scholarly evidence. She has pored over county record offices and immersed herself in journals and miscellanies. But rather than let the evidence speak for itself she often misrepresents it to support prejudices that would have been unfathomable to her subjects.

One can see this in the way she treats the subject of childbirth. For Vickery and other feminist historians, the question of how past women viewed childbirth must necessarily present embarrassing challenges to feminist orthodoxy, particularly as this relates to abortion. Of course, there were no pro-abortion women in the 18th century or in any other century prior to the late 20th century: They were all categorically (the feminist historian might say "benightedly") pro-life. Yet what is remarkable is how this never seems to disconcert feminist historians. It certainly never deters Vickery from saddling her philoprogenitive subjects with attitudes hostile to the very idea of childbirth.

If the evidence shows that women assumed the responsibilities of motherhood bravely and, on the whole, uncomplainingly, despite the considerable perils of childbirth in an era without the benefit of obstetrics, Vickery must always insist that this is a sign of "acquiescence," never of choice, never of preference, and certainly never of self-sacrificial love. If one objects that motherhood was an inalienable part of female identity in the 18th as in any other century, Vickery has her answer ready:

Linked to the celebration of marriage was the growing sentimentalisation of motherhood. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reaping the Rich Inheritance of Love: Motherhood in Georgian England
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.