Conference Considers Judicial Reform

By Albertsen, Joanne; Reddick, Malia | Judicature, September/October 2008 | Go to article overview

Conference Considers Judicial Reform

Albertsen, Joanne, Reddick, Malia, Judicature

On April 8, 2008, judges, lawyers, business leaders, academics, and representatives of court reform organizations assembled at Fordham Law School to consider the most serious threats to judicial independence and discuss reforms to counter them. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O'Connor (Ret.) and Stephen G. Breyer were active participants in this discussion. The conference, titled "Enhancing Judicial Independence, Accountability, and Selection for the State Court Judiciary: A Program for Reform," was the fourth regional conference offered under the aus- pices of the Sandra Day O'Connor Project on the State of the Judiciary at Georgetown University Law Cen- ter. Attorney Norman Greene of Schoeman Updike & Kaufman, LLP in New York City organized and coor- dinated the conference. The O'Connor Project has also hosted annual national conferences since 2006. The most recent was held in Washington, D.C., on October 2, 2008, entided "Our Courts and Corporate Citizenship."

The program began with remarks from Justices O'Connor and Breyer that set the stage for four panel discussions to follow. The first panel explored the core concepts of judicial independence, impartiality, and accountability and their importance for state courts and judges. As she often has since retiring from the Court, Justice O'Connor spoke about the threat to judicial independence posed by judicial elections. "We've put cash in the courtroom, and it's just wrong," she said. She went on to describe a conversation with trial lawyers from a state with partisan judicial races, who told her candidly that part of their trial preparation included finding out how much the opposing counsel had contributed to the assigned judge's campaign and matching that contribution.

Justice O'Connor also discussed other types of threats to judicial independence, recalling FDR's 1937 plan to "pack" the Court with proNew Deal justices and the "Impeach Earl Warren" billboards of the 1960s. She noted that she had observed increasing numbers of attacks on judges during her final years on the Court, describing the 2006 "J.A.I.L. 4 Judges" ballot initiative in South Dakota as the most extreme. The Judicial Accountability Initiative Law would have amended the state constitution to strip judges of legal immunity for their official actions, allowing lawsuits and even criminal prosecution.

According to Justice O'Connor, "Judicial independence is a bedrock principle, and we're losing it." O'Connor asserted that judges should be held accountable for whether they adhere to the codes of judicial conduct and ethics rather than whether the public agrees with their decisions. She referred to state judicial disciplinary processes as an appropriate mechanism for ensuring this kind of accountability.

Justice Breyer described judicial independence as a topic of great interest to judges and of very little interest to everyone else. He expressed concern that "half the country thinks judges decide cases any way they want." Breyer urged that citizens need to have confidence that state judges decide cases based on the law and the facts, rather than because of political pressure from those who appointed or elected them.

Justice Breyer characterized the American justice system as more fair and independent than that of many other countries, but he cautioned that the confidence of the American people in the judiciary is waning. With the dramatic increase over the last decade in campaign fundraising and spending and special interest activity in judicial elections, it is not surprising that Americans are doubting the impartiality of the courts.

According to Breyer, there is no "magic bullet" to address these concerns, as threats to judicial independence and impartiality can arise in appointive as well as elective systems. But steps can be taken to improve judicial selection systems and to prevent the problems that exist from getting worse. Justices O'Connor and Breyer agreed that it will require the interest of concerned citizens in each state to talk about these concerns and take action to address them. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Conference Considers Judicial Reform


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.