Reforming Our Broken System of Justice

By Mead, Walter B. | Judicature, September/October 2008 | Go to article overview

Reforming Our Broken System of Justice


Mead, Walter B., Judicature


Reforming our broken system of justice by Walter B. Mead Adversarial justice: America's Court System on Trial, by Theodore L. Kubicek. Algora Publishing. 2006. 210 pages. $29.95 ($23.95 paper).

Adversarial Justice: America's Court System on Trial, by Theodore (Ted) Kubicek, is a refreshing and alarmingly candid scrutiny of the American bar and the American system of justice, and what we can do to reform the broken system.

This book should be required reading in all law schools. Because of its clarity, it also warrants being on the 'must reading' list of the layperson, who has long sensed that something is seriously wrong with the American justice system, but also wonders specifically what - apart from the interminable delays and prohibitive costs incurred in seeking justice - is wrong and what can be done about it. Further, the perusal of this brilliant and courageous critique should be considered imperative for legal practitioners, most of whom are fully aware that something is broken, if not indeed 'rotten,' in the state of their chosen profession.

The author's own experience is instructive:

During my forty years practicing law, I avoided the field of battle known as the courtroom as much as possible as I soon became disenchanted with the adversarial system of justice.... I have long hoped the judicial system would change, a useless wait so far, although a few, mostly judges and law professors, have questioned the system. These writers have been largely ignored by the organized bar. (p. 5)

Kubicek and his sources identify some of the problems with our adversarial system. Chief among them is the fact that the process, as the word 'adversarial' suggests, is not consensual and collegial between the parties, but contentious. The courtroom is described as a scene of batde. And Kubicek reminds us that

while most comments throughout this book seem to apply to our criminal system, keep in mind that the adversarial system applies equally to our civil procedure. Whether it is a criminal or civil case, all parties - plaintiffs, prosecutors, and defendants alike - desire to win. (pp. 54-55)

Elsewhere, he notes that where the remuneration of attorneys, in civil cases, is based upon a percentage of the award of the court, there is even further incentive to win. And winning - whether in civil or criminal cases - being the supreme objective, unfortunately, means winning at virtually all costs - constrained, at best, only by very ambiguously and loosely defined professional guidelines and, not infrequendy, gready stretched interpretations of both statutory and constitutional law. This means that truth, itself so integral a part of the inquisitorial system, is jettisoned, except where it conveniently does not interfere with the objective of winning. Kubicek observes that, within the "game-playing" rules of the adversary system, "No lawyer deemed [worthy of her salt] would engage in a trial with an attitude of not winning. . . .Truth [being too often obstructive of this goal] becomes irrelevant." (p.19)

The same ABA Rules that suggest that attorneys have an obligation to act as officers of the court also emphasize their responsibility to win and, therefore, to "zealously advocate" for their clients. Kubicek makes it clear that you can't have it both ways. The Rules are, indeed, replete with inconsistencies, ambiguities, and loopholes. Presumably, an attorney who acts in the spirit of being an officer of the court and thereby is deemed insufficiently zealous in advocating for his client could be punished for his laxity.

In their attempt to win at all costs, under the rules of adversary justice, lawyers employ a practically endless repertoire of tricks. "The adversarial trial system," Kubicek says, "opens wide the doors to all kinds of irrelevant but successful trial tactics on the part of defense counsel." He critiques all of these adversarial devices, and more, proposing that there are a few procedures in the adversarial system that, if not abused, can be retained in a more inquisitorial approach, many that must be significandy curtailed, and still others that simply are so inconsistent with the pursuit of truth and justice, at least in contested cases (that is, in all criminal and some civil cases), that they must be eliminated. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reforming Our Broken System of Justice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.