An Examination of the Legal Debate regarding Race-Based Education Policies from 1849 to 1964

By Dorsey, Dana Thompson | Negro Educational Review, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

An Examination of the Legal Debate regarding Race-Based Education Policies from 1849 to 1964


Dorsey, Dana Thompson, Negro Educational Review


Abstract

In June 2007, the United States Supreme Court rendered its most recent decision on the constitutionality of race-based education policies. The Court decided that race-based student assignment policies implemented in two school districts to ensure racially integrated schools violated the United States Constitution. Since the implementation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the creation of affirmative action policies, the legal and political debate regarding race-based policies has been constant and explosive; there does not seem to be an end in sight. In this first decade of the 21st century, the debate is rooted in age-old legal cases and legislation. The United States' legal history helped to shape current educational policies as well as societal attitudes which consider race in the academic admissions process. This examination of federal race-based legal cases and legislation addressing the period from the mid-1800s through the implementation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 reveals the courts' role in perpetuating the notion of White privilege and legally endorsing discrimination and segregation in education for more than a hundred years. The examination also demonstrates how legal cases and legislation necessitated race-conscious affirmative action policies.

Introduction

Once again the United States Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of race-based policies in an educational setting in June 2007 (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 ,et al.; Crystal D. Meredith, Custodial Parent and Next Friend of Joshua Ryan McDonald v. Jefferson County Board of Education, et al., 2007). It ruled that two school districts' policies of race-based student assignment to schools to ensure racial integration were in violation of the United States Constitution. The Court has been relatively quiet on this issue since the University of Mchigan decisions in Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutier v. Bollinger (2003). In Gratz (2003), the Supreme Court found that the University of Mchigan's undergraduate freshman admissions policy was not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest in diversity because underrepresented minorities were automatically assigned points during the admissions process. Therefore, the undergraduate admissions policy was unconstitutional (Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003). On the other hand, in Grutier the Supreme Court held that the University of Mchigan Law School had a compelling state interest in attaining a diverse student body, and the admissions policy's use of race was narrowly tailored to further that interest. The Law School's policy of seeking to enroll a critical mass of minority students did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act since it engaged in a highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file (Grutier v. Bollinger, 2003). The divergent decisions delivered in these cases made the already divisive topic of race-based affirmative policies even more perplexing and controversial for American citizens and policymakers. The fact that Justice O'Connor, who wrote the Grutter opinion, urged that all race-conscious admissions policies have a logical end point of preferably 25 years or fewer meant that the legal debate would likely live on until race-based policies were eliminated completely (Grutter v. Bollinger, 2003).

In addition to the Mchigan legal cases, the debate surrounding race-based policies in education was just as strong in the state legislatures and state executive offices at the conclusion of the 20th century as it was on a federal level. For instance, several states in the union led the anti-affirmative action cause by either completely banning or severely limiting the use of any race-conscious policies. Voters in California, Washington, and Mchigan abolished affirmative action policies through state referenda (California Civil Rights Initiative, Proposition 209, 1996; Mchigan Civil Rights Initiative, Proposition 2, 2007; Washington State Civil Rights Initiative 200, 1998). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Examination of the Legal Debate regarding Race-Based Education Policies from 1849 to 1964
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.