Land Use Regulations and Housing Markets in Large Metropolitan Areas

By Xing, Xifang; Hartzell, David J. et al. | Journal of Housing Research, January 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Land Use Regulations and Housing Markets in Large Metropolitan Areas


Xing, Xifang, Hartzell, David J., Godschalk, David R., Journal of Housing Research


Abstract

This article examines the impacts of land use regulations on cross-metropolitan variations in housing prices, rents and housing starts. Based on a 2002 national survey of local jurisdictions' land use regulations, two indices of regulatory stringency are created: one measures the use of growth management tools and the other measures the impacts of development process administrative practices. The results show that the growth management tools index is positively associated with housing prices and rents. A positive relationship is also found between the growth management tools index and the number of starts of multiple-unit housing. Similarly, a positive relationship is seen between the development process index and metropolitan housing prices and rents. In addition, more restrictive development processes, as measured by the index, restrain housing starts under conditions of rapid population growth.

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)

Introduction

Land use controls are pervasive across the United States. States, cities and counties manage the use of land in many ways. Development restrictions can have a significant impact on the behavior of real estate developers, owners and renters. Despite the relative pervasiveness of such controls, very few studies have analyzed the impacts of their imposition across a large number of metropolitan areas.

This article provides the results of a survey of planning directors in large metropolitan areas in the U.S. The objective of the survey was to determine land use controls that were in use in metropolitan areas, and how the implementation of these controls impacts development. In addition, the study sought to determine the ways that such controls are explicitly and implicitly applied in different cities and counties in the U.S. Explicit tools are specific regulatory devices that are used to manage the supply and development of land. Implicit constraints result from administrative practices within jurisdictions.

Explicit regulatory tools allow local governments to proactively manage their growth, rather than simply responding to development requests. For example, adequate public facilities ordinances are designed to ensure that infrastructure is in place prior to the approval of a development project that will be drawing on the infrastructure. In some jurisdictions, for example, development entitlements are not given until it is certain that the capacity of roads, utilities, or schools is there to meet increased demand on these facilities. Other examples of explicit controls include impact fees, development permit caps and urban growth boundaries. In each case, the restriction is imposed on developers to define what can be done or where it can be done, and if it imposes externalities, how the cost is passed on to the developer and consumer (Porter, 1997).

Other restrictive activities on the part of local jurisdictions are more implicit, and the result of administrative responses to development requests. For example, developers in every jurisdiction must seek approval for their projects. The process typically involves applying for entitlements to build the project that is desired. In many jurisdictions, the number of months that it takes from application to approval can be quite short. In others, the time period from application to approval of entitlements can be quite long, in effect constraining the amount and timing of development through delays in the review and approval process. While there is no explicit restriction, in practice the delay lengthens the development period and increases the cost to the developer (Luger and Temkin, 2000).

Many jurisdictions receive a large number of development applications but approve very few of them. This is also an administrative form of development restrictiveness. If a large number of applications are turned down, this indicates a stringent land management system. A similar argument can be made regarding the percentage of applications approved requesting expansion of the supply of developable land through rezoning or annexation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Land Use Regulations and Housing Markets in Large Metropolitan Areas
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.