The Persistence of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Additional Explanation1

By Skelley, B. Douglas | Public Administration Quarterly, Winter 2008 | Go to article overview

The Persistence of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Additional Explanation1


Skelley, B. Douglas, Public Administration Quarterly


ABSTRACT

An enduring notion in American public administration, "the politics-administration dichotomy" persists in academic discussions and in the practical talk of administrators. Dismissed variously as a fiction, intellectual aberration, or political rationale, the dichotomy's persistence may have its foundation in the nature of the decision-making processes of large bureaucratic organizations. Using Brunsson's models of the "political" and "action" functions of large public organizations, this research adds to the explanations of the notion's durability and explores the implications of this interpretation for public administration theory and organizations.

Waldo (1984) characterizes the politics-administration dichotomy as a "perdurable" feature of American public administrative thought. Two recent exchanges between Svara (2006, 2008) and Overeem (2006, 2008) testify to this fact: the former rejecting "dichotomy" as a term in favor of "complementarity," the latter valuing "dichotomy" for its implied political neutrality. From the time that Wilson (1978) articulated the possibility that administration is a sphere of activity distinct from politics, the notion has been with us as an empirical statement, historico-cultural consequence, reform rationale, behavioral norm, myth, intellectual aberration, and a process gap. Conceptual arguments not withstanding, the dichotomy has provided a perspective for assessing the neo-liberal managerialism that has permeated administrative thinking for the past three decades (Box, 1999; Cox, 2002; Kobrak, 1996; Rosenbloom & Ross, 1994). The dichotomy, as fact or ideological invention, continues to be debated and to withstand attacks on its "Progressive orthodoxy." It persists despite evidence that politics and administration are inseparably linked in a number of ways:

(a) administrative acts have political consequences;

(b) administrators initiate policy;

(c) administrators shape policy after the fact;

(d) civil servants are not politically neutral;

(e) legislators investigate and intervene in administrative processes.

Despite this evidence the dichotomy remains a seminal idea in American public administration and appears unlikely to go away.

Explaining the relationship between the nominal policy makers, elected or appointed, and the nominal implementers of policy presents political science and public administration with one of the greatest of theoretical challenges (Moe, 1990). This paper points to evidence regarding organizational decision processes, identified in the institutional literature, which may add to the explanation for this concept's perdurability while amplifying our understanding of the connections between these two spheres. The implications of this interpretation for public administration theory, the prospects for organizational reform and the implications for governance are explored below.2

EXPLANATIONS FOR THE DICHOTOMY'S "PERDURABILITY"

Waldo (1984a, 1984b, 1987) suggests two reasons for the persistence of this notion. In The Administrative State (1984a) he finds the source of the politics-administration divide in unresolved issues arising from the separation of powers doctrine expressed in the U.S. Constitution. The division allowed rationales for Progressive administrative and political reforms. These reforms strengthened the executive under the guise of efficiency while protecting establishment interests from politicians manipulating immigrant newcomers for other ends. Although he admits that, by the end of the 1930's, no one took a practical separation of the two activities seriously and most recognized the role of administrators as policy initiators, the popularity of the dichotomy continued. Later Waldo (1987) finds the idea sustained in part by two philosophical streams in Western culture, the Greek civic-culture (political) tradition and the Roman imperial (administrative) tradition, inherited by the American system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Persistence of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Additional Explanation1
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.