The Impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard 5 on Audit Fees

By Jiang, Wei; Wu, Jia | The CPA Journal, April 2009 | Go to article overview

The Impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard 5 on Audit Fees


Jiang, Wei, Wu, Jia, The CPA Journal


Several provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) have led to tightened audit regulations and considerable increases in audit fees. For example, SOX section 103 requires audit workpaper retention for a minimum of seven years, and section 404(b) requires that auditors attest to management's assessment of its internal controls. In 2004, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) issued Auditing Standard 2 (AS2), An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements, to address these new audit requirements. Due to the added audit work, auditors tended to charge higher audit fees, and companies had to devote more resources to meet the new requirements. A number of publicly traded companies have expressed their concerns about tiie increased financial and staffing burdens as a result of these more stringent auditing regulations. In some extreme cases, to avoid tiie added burdens, some of these companies have either gone private or moved to securities markets in other countries. In reaction to the high compliance costs and other concerns, the SEC postponed SOX section 404(b) auditor attestation requirements four times (to fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009), for nonaccelerated filers that were primarily small entities.

After two years of closely monitoring AS2 implementation, the PCAOB found that tiie benefits of internal control audits came at a significant cost In light of these findings, the PCAOB released Auditing Standard S (AS5), An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements, in 2007, which loosens some of these auditing requirements to alleviate the financial burden on public companies. ASS is designed to provide guidance to auditors on how to more effectively identify internal control weaknesses and, at the same time, eliminate costly and unnecessary procedures. There is some disagreement, however, on the potential cost savings that will result from this guidance, which advocates a risk-based approach to section 404. Former PCAOB deputy chief auditor Laura J. Phillips estimates that the new rules could result in a 10% reduction in related audit fees. Cynthia Fornelli, executive director of the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ)- an AICPA-affiliated nonprofit organization that represents almost 800 public accounting firms - cautions, 'It's dangerous to speculate about tiie cost savings at this point." Recent trends in reported audit fees provide a basis for analyzing tiie impact of ASS.

Key Differences Between AS5 and AS2

Five key differences between the requirements of ASS and AS2 are outlined below: 1) the degree of auditor discretion in identification of material weaknesses; 2) the top-down versus bottom-up approach in audit planning; 3) the scalability of the audit; 4) the ability to rely on tiie work of others; and S) the requirement for walkthroughs of significant transactions. The differences between AS2 and ASS are also summarized in Exhibit 1.

AS2 consisted of a detailed set of rules-based auditing standards which prescribed procedures for internal control audits, whereas ASS is more principlesbased, affording some discretion to the auditor. AS2 specified eight "strong indicators" of the existence of internal control material weakness: financial report restatement, internal control detection failures, an ineffective audit committee, an ineffective internal audit function or risk assessment function, an ineffective compliance function for entities in highly regulated industries, senior management fraud, uncor- rected significant deficiencies, and an inef- fective control environment. AS2 required auditors to regard and report these cir- cumstances as significant deficiencies and encouraged auditors to treat these "strong indicators" as material weaknesses. As a result, AS2 may have caused cautious audi- tors to direct audit efforts to all of the list- ed indicators, including those that were unlikely to lead to a material weakness in tiie context of tiie particular audit ASS uses the term "indicators" as opposed to "strong indicators," and explicitly states that the existence of these indicators does not necessary mandate the conclusion that internal control is ineffective. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of PCAOB Auditing Standard 5 on Audit Fees
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.