Regulating Recognition Decisions through Incremental Reinforcement Learning

By Han, Sanghoon; Dobbins, Ian G. | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2009 | Go to article overview

Regulating Recognition Decisions through Incremental Reinforcement Learning


Han, Sanghoon, Dobbins, Ian G., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


Does incremental reinforcement learning influence recognition memory judgments? We examined this question by subtly altering the relative validity or availability of feedback in order to differentially reinforce old or new recognition judgments. Experiment 1 probabilistically and incorrectly indicated that either misses or false alarms were correct in the context of feedback that was otherwise accurate. Experiment 2 selectively withheld feedback for either misses or false alarms in the context of feedback that was otherwise present. Both manipulations caused prominent shifts of recognition memory decision criteria that remained for considerable periods even after feedback had been altogether removed. Overall, these data demonstrate that incremental reinforcement-learning mechanisms influence the degree of caution subjects exercise when evaluating explicit memories.

Recognition criteria are hypothetical standards by which memory evidence is categorized as either sufficient or inadequate to warrant a judgment of prior encounter (viz., old ) (Macmillan & Creelman, 1991; see Figure 1). Although most memory researchers assume that criteria are adaptive, there are few models of learning that might support such adaptability (however, see Estes & Maddox, 1995; Unkelbach, 2006), and to date, the vast majority of successful manipulations of memory decision criteria have involved explicit instructions given to observers about the relative preponderance of old and new items (Hirshman, 1998; Rotello, Macmillan, Reeder, & Wong, 2005; Strack & Förster, 1995) or explicit warnings to avoid errors of either omission or commission (Azimian- Faridani & Wilding, 2006). These instructed criterion shifts are sometimes augmented with clear descriptions of monetary losses and gains attached to different response outcomes (payoff matrices; see Van Zandt, 2000), but in all of these cases, observers consciously attempt to comply with instructions, given their understanding of test list regularities or characteristics. What remains unclear is whether the decision criterion can adapt without an explicit or controlled strategy.

One candidate mechanism we propose that might enable adaptive positioning of a criterion is incremental reinforcement learning, which is central for learning category distinctions in other nonrecognition domains (e.g., Gluck & Bower, 1988; Poldrack et al., 2005). Such learning requires integrating trial-by-trial feedback outcomes and gradual remapping of different decisions onto different stimulus feature or feature combinations as a function of probabilistic reward likelihood (for a review, see Ashby & Maddox, 2005). Two category-learning paradigms having this characteristic are information integration and probabilistic classification tasks. During both, the relationship between key stimulus features and appropriate decisions cannot be reduced to a simple explicit, verbalizable strategy, because observers must classify the items on the basis of complex combinations of multiple feature dimensions (e.g., a nonlinear combination of thickness and orientation of sinusoidal gratings) or because feedback is rendered probabilistically, so that making the same judgment for a given repeated stimulus does not guarantee receiving the same feedback outcome on every trial (see also Ashby & O'Brien, 2007). Neuropsychological findings suggest that learning during these tasks relies heavily upon the integrity of the striatum, a basal ganglia structure linked to implicit procedural and habit learning (Knowlton, Mangels, & Squire, 1996; Saint-Cyr, Taylor, & Lang, 1988).

Although feedback-based changes in criteria have frequently been examined in perceptual judgment tasks (e.g., Dorfman & Biderman, 1971; Thomas, 1973), there are fundamental differences between perceptual classification tasks and the regulation of episodic recognition judgments. More specifically, in feedback-based category-learning tasks, it is assumed that the mapping between object features and category decisions is incrementally altered via trial-by-trial feedback learning. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Regulating Recognition Decisions through Incremental Reinforcement Learning
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.